Answer:
d. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take proper account of differences in the sizes of projects.
CORRECT As the project yields over time can differ. This generates that projects with a lower IRR can achieve a higher NPV at lower rates.
There is a crossover point after which a projects NPV are equal and from there the one with higher IRR obtains better NPV
Explanation:
a. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the time value of money.
FALSE both method consider time value of money
b. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of the cost of capital
FALSE The IRR can be compared against the cost of capital to indicate wether or not a project should be preferable
.c. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR values a dollar received today the same as a dollar that will not be received until sometime in the future.
FALSE IRR considers the time value of money
e. One defect of the IRR method versus the NPV is that the IRR does not take account of cash flows over a project's full life.
FALSE it considers all the cash flows over the project's full life.
Answer:
The answer is A. $5,784,000
Explanation:
[(1.08)/(1.11)] -1 = -3.6%
Thus one year forward rate is 0.60*[1 +(0.036)] = $5784
$5784 * 10 000 000= <u>$5,784,000</u>
I would say just stop being around them and don't speak or talk about them if u dont wanna be they topic
Answer:
50%
Explanation:
Given: Selling price= $120 per unit.
Variable cost= $60 per unit.
First computing contribution margin.
Contribution margin= 
⇒ Contribution margin= 
∴ Contribution margin= 
Now, calculating the contribution margin ratio.
Contribution margin ratio= 
⇒ Contribution margin ratio= 
∴ Contribution margin ratio= 
Hence, the product´s contribution ratio is 50%.
Yes because you aren’t doing anything special with your bookstore since it is the same as others
