<span>The biggest problem with this system is that the senate didn't set up any controls on the tax farmers. While most Romans were willing to pay taxes, and even allow the tax farmer some profit, many of the tax farmers went way beyond what people expected. Under Roman law you could pay someone to vote for you.</span>
Asking whether or not religion conflicts with science is too broad a question. Of course there are certain religions that conflict with science; Christian fundamentalism, with its claims of God creating the world in six days and the human race springing from a woman tempted by a talking snake, obviously conflicts with well-established science. Yet there are many other religions which do not conflict with science. As a Catholic, I have not once encountered a belief held by the Church that contradicts anything that I have learned during my time Some might find this surprising; I was once chatting with a friend who told me that she could never be Catholic because she “believed in evolution.” The Catholic Church subscribes to the theory of evolution, as do most Jews and some sects of Islam. One of the most common reasons individuals believe that science and a given religion conflict is that they have misunderstood the beliefs of that religion. This makes sense, as many popular movies and television shows have portrayed all Christians, regardless of sect, as ignorant bible-thumpers who believe that people rode dinosaurs. goodluck
the answer to this question is 1787.
They bought complex social and economic changes that led to riots, strikes and the emergence of the unions.
They showed no concern for their workers, keeping their wages at a minimum, and reduced them as they felt fit. Many of them suffered poor standards of living while the Robber Barons lived luxurious lives.
Because of them today money goes around the world so that people could either become rich or poor