All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
I'll tell you the simple stuff, I hope this helps you. For Japan the leader was to be called an emperor or empress who could only be a part of the royal family if they were related to the Shinto sun goddess. As for Europe, the leader was to be called a king or a queen. Like Japan, not just anybody could become royalty. Kings and queens came from a long descent of an Imperial family........
January 6, 1759, to Martha Washington
Calvin<span> made a powerful </span>impact<span> on the fundamental doctrines of Protestantism, and is widely credited as the most important figure in the second generation of the Protestant </span><span>Reformation</span>
Enlightenment thinkers most contributed to the development of which political idea social contract and natural rights.
<h3>What is social contract?</h3>
Social contract can be defined as a form of agreement in which people tend to to forgone their right so as so protect another right they have.
Enlightenment thinkers tend to believe that improving people state of life or well being while they are still alive is the best.
Therefore Enlightenment thinkers most contributed to the development of which political idea social contract and natural rights.
Learn more about social contract here:brainly.com/question/17260213
#SPJ1
