The meeting between Washington and Phillis Wheatley allowed him to understand slavery deeply through Phillis Wheatley's explanation that he lived in this violent and oppressive system.
<h3>Who was Phillis Wheatley?</h3>
- She was the first African-American poet.
- She was taken to America as a slave when she was 7 years old.
- She worked as a slave and suffered all the problems that racism and prejudice could promote.
Phillis Wheatley's work addressed the violence of slavery and the oppression that blacks lived in America. She had the property to talk about this subject, as she had lived it since her childhood.
For this reason, she was able to show Washington how his views on slavery and race were wrong and needed to be changed.
More information about Phillis Wheatley at the link:
brainly.com/question/1982784
Answer:
This question is incomplete. Anyway, I will give you an explanation with an example for you to understand each of these literary devices.
Explanation:
- Alliteration is an expressive device that consists of the notorious repetition of the same or the same sounds, especially consonants, in a sentence. Example: Peter Piper picked a peck of pickled peppers.
- An oxymoron is a word or expression that has been formed by combining two terms of opposite meaning. Example: Amazingly awful.
- The allusion is a linguistic device (rhetorical figure) that refers to something without mentioning it directly. Example: She felt like was on the moon.
- Repetition is a group of rhetorical figures that consists of the repetition of words or other expressive resources. Example: Time after time.
Answer:
Life goes on despite terrible occurrences.
Explanation:
"In Spite of War" is a poem written by<em> Angela Morgan</em>. It shows the readers that life goes on even after terrible happenings around the world, such as earthquakes or war. Many people die every time, but<u><em> life continues</em></u>. She depicted life by emphasizing the <em>"blooming of the flowers."</em> In order for people to enjoy the life that they're living, in whatever era or situation, they should<em> look at its brighter side and be grateful.</em> Doing this can give them a <em>hope</em> to<u><em> continue living</em></u>.
The interaction between Mr. and Mrs. Pontellier establishes the central focus as it moves from a small disagreement between the couple to an argument and silence between the two.
Through questions like yours, it is possible to discover that your question refers to the text that is attached in the figure below.
By reading this text, we can see that:
- The interaction between Mr. and Mrs. Pontellier has, as its main focus, the disagreement between them.
- This disagreement starts with a small discomfort, where Mr. Pontellier wants to talk to his wife, but she is uninterested.
- This disagreement then turns into an argument where Mr. Pontellier accuses his wife of negligence and of being a bad and inattentive mother.
- The argument shakes Mrs. Pontillier and she decides not to respond and causes an uncomfortable silence between herself and her husband.
With this, we can see that the couple has difficulties to live peacefully with each other.
More information:
brainly.com/question/23606786?referrer=searchResults
A is the answer he loved her and he would love her until the day he was too old for loving _ but he could not have her . So he tested the deep pain that is reserved only for the strong just as he had tasted for a little while the deep happiness
