Why could the British restriction of trade be considered a violation of natural rights?

1 answer:

6 0

The british restriction of trade could be considered a violation of human rights because the restrictions interfere with individual pursuit of economic interest.

The british restriction of trade gave the power for the Government to limit the type and the amount of Goods that could be traded that will benefit the Government itself

hope this helps

You might be interested in

Which of the following is not a power of the president

ser-zykov [4K]

I have already answered this question on another brainly question an the answer is that the president doesn't have the power to declare war

5 0

2 years ago

In which area do the United States' state and federal governments share power?

Vladimir79 [104]

Federal government but i am not sure completely

4 0

2 years ago

The united states declared war on great britain in 1812 because

MissTica

Answer: The United States declared war on Britain in 1812. It did so because Britain refused to stop seizing American ships that traded with France—Britain's enemy in Europe.

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

How did Ida B. Wells work toward Progressive reform?

ExtremeBDS [4]

The correct answer is C) <span>By writing articles about the horrors of lynching in the South.
</span>
One of the ways in which Ida B. Wells worked toward Progressive reform was "C. By writing articles about the horrors of lynching in the South," since the used her influence to "open the eyes" of both blacks and whites.

3 0

3 years ago

Why did Europeans travel cross the Mediterranean Sea to search the Silk Road

attashe74 [19]

The Europeans traveled across the Mediterranean Sea to search the Silk Road to A) obtain clothes, spices, and other goods. They were not necessarily interested in ancient religious sites, they were not escaping natural disasters at home, and to a degree they were searching for new opportunities, but the better answer is A.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers