Why could the British restriction of trade be considered a violation of natural rights?

1 answer:

6 0

The british restriction of trade could be considered a violation of human rights because the restrictions interfere with individual pursuit of economic interest.

The british restriction of trade gave the power for the Government to limit the type and the amount of Goods that could be traded that will benefit the Government itself

hope this helps

You might be interested in

Which contributed to the spread of domestic terrorism?

agasfer [191]

it was the colonial groups seeking independence from imperialistic powers

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did Louisiana colonists dislike Ulloa?

AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

all i know is that the Islenos were sent to Louisiana to increase the number of soldiers and loyal colonists.

Explanation:

have a nice day and i hope this helps

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The National Labor Relations Act protects all of the following EXCEPT: Select one: a. The right to NOT sign a yellow dog contrac

shusha [124]

Answer: the right to not sign a yellow dog contract

Explanation:

According to the constitutional history of interfering with employees rights section 7 & 8(1), it includes all the following; right to join a union without fear of retaliation or discrimination, The right of non-unionized employees to collectively organize, The right to NOT join a union and pay dues if an employee does not want to be a member, The right for unions to strike (under certain conditions) except the right not to sign a yellow dog contract

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

crimeas [40]

Phillipson states the Twelve Tables were, “A set of statutes known as the Twelve Tables that was passed by an early assembly served as the foundation of the Roman private law.

3 0

3 years ago

If you were in Lincoln's position would you have kept General McClellan or replaced him as well? Why or why not? 4 SENTENCES

Dafna1 [17]

If I am to be in Lincoln's position I would have removed General McClellan because of his failure to perform up to the task of destroying Lee's army.

<h3>Why should General McClellan removed?</h3>

During the The Battle of Antietam which can be described as the single bloodiest day during the combat in the Civil War.

It was a battle that that was presented as a Union victory in the Northern press can be seen as effect a tactical draw.

An during this battle , McClellan was so frustrated and this makes him to fail by not be able to destroy Lee's arm.

However, Lincoln officially removed him from being the commander hence If I am to be in Lincoln's position I would have removed General McClellan because of his failure to perform up to the task of destroying Lee's army.

Learn more Lincoln at:

brainly.com/question/26112254

#SPJ1

7 0

1 year ago