1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elanso [62]
3 years ago
6

What was most significant about the House of Burgesses during colonial times?

History
1 answer:
Assoli18 [71]3 years ago
6 0
The most significant element of the Virginia House of Burgesses during colonial times was that it was the first (limited) democratic body in North America--meaning that it was a huge inspiration to the Founding Fathers when it came time to separate from Britain. 
You might be interested in
Help please this hw and idk how to do anything
slava [35]

Answer:

The ones who controlled the food were the ones who had the power

4 0
3 years ago
LEGAL TRADITIONS In America today, we live under laws that are rooted in ancient traditions. It's rather eye-opening to trace so
frozen [14]

Is this a question or a refresher?

3 0
3 years ago
Which city was a center of trade and learning in West Africa?
Serga [27]

Answer:

Timbuktu

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
the eleventh-century explorations and discoveries of leif eriksson were common knowledge in the european world of the fifteenth
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Compare the social climate of the United States at the beginning of the Great War to the social climate at the end of the war. H
Rina8888 [55]

USA enters the Great War

Wilson’s most passionate desire, aside from avoiding belligerency, was to bring an end to the war through his personal mediation. He sent Colonel House to Europe in early 1915 to explore the possibilities of peace and again early in 1916 to press for a plan of Anglo-American cooperation for peace. The British refused to cooperate, and the president, more than ever eager to avoid a final confrontation with Germany on the submarine issue, decided to press forward with independent mediation. He was by this time also angered by the intensification of British blockade practices and convinced that both sides were fighting for world domination and spoils. On December 18, 1916, Wilson asked the belligerents to state the terms upon which they would be willing to make peace. Soon afterward, in secret, high-level negotiations, he appealed to Britain and Germany to hold an early peace conference under his leadership.

Break with Germany

Chances for peace were blasted by a decision of the German leaders, made at an imperial conference on January 9, 1917, to inaugurate an all-out submarine war against all commerce, neutral as well as belligerent. The Germans knew that such a campaign would bring the United States into the war, but they were confident that their augmented submarine fleet could starve Britain into submission before the United States could mobilize and participate effectively.

The announcement of the new submarine blockade in January left the president no alternative but to break diplomatic relations with Germany, which he did on February 3. At the same time, and in subsequent addresses, the president made it clear that he would accept unrestricted submarine warfare against belligerent merchantmen and would act only if American ships were sunk. In early March he put arms on American ships in the hope that this would deter submarine attacks. The Germans began to sink American ships indiscriminately in mid-March, and on April 2 Wilson asked Congress to recognize that a state of war existed between the United States and the German Empire. Congress approved the war resolution quickly, and Wilson signed it on April 6. (For U.S. military involvement in World War I, see the article World War I.)

“Big Four”

“Big Four”

The “Big Four” (left to right): David Lloyd George of Britain, Vittorio Orlando of Italy, Georges Clemenceau of France, and Woodrow Wilson of the United States, the principal architects of the Treaty of Versailles.

National Archives, Washington, D.C.

The fight over the treaty and the election of 1920

Public opinion in the United States seemed strongly in favour of quick ratification of the Versailles Treaty when the president presented that document to the Senate in July 1919. Traditional isolationist sentiment was beginning to revive, however, and a small minority of 16 senators, irreconcilably opposed to U.S. membership in the League, vowed to oppose the treaty to the bitter end. In addition, a crucial controversy developed between the president and a majority of the Republican senators, led by Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts. Lodge insisted upon adding 14 reservations to the treaty. The second reservation declared that the United States assumed no obligations under Article X of the Covenant, which guaranteed the integrity and independence of members of the League; moreover it said that the president could not use the armed forces to support the Covenant without the explicit consent of Congress.

Henry Cabot Lodge

Henry Cabot Lodge

Henry Cabot Lodge, c. 1898.

Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. (Digital File Number: cph.3b25369)

Calling this reservation a nullification of the treaty, Wilson in September made a long speaking tour of the West to build up public support for unconditional ratification. He suffered a breakdown at the end of his tour and a serious stroke on October 2. The president’s illness, which incapacitated him for several months, increased his intransigence against the Lodge reservations; with equal stubbornness, the Massachusetts senator refused to consent to any compromise. The result was failure to obtain the necessary two-thirds majority for ratification, with or without reservations, when the Senate voted on November 19, 1919, and again on March 19, 1920.

Wilson had suggested that the ensuing presidential campaign and election should be a “great and solemn referendum” on the League. The Democratic candidate, James M. Cox of Ohio, fought hard to make it the leading issue, but the Republican candidate, Warren G. Harding of Ohio, was evasive on the subject, and a group of 31 leading Republican internationalists assured the country that Harding’s election would be the best guarantee of U.S. membership in the League of Nations. Harding swamped Cox (see U.S. presidential election of 1920),

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ustrate What challenges did women and African Americans face during World War I?
    11·1 answer
  • Which letter indicates the route taken by Spanish explorer, Ponce de León?
    6·2 answers
  • 4. Americans writing a set of rules is to the Constitution Era as America
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is true about a person who acquires stock in a company? That person...
    14·2 answers
  • Which word means "a matter of little or no importance?"
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these is NOT a way the samurai were similar to European knights?
    7·1 answer
  • How is the term society defined?
    10·1 answer
  • What is great the impact of the great depression​
    14·1 answer
  • Why was the Sahara also called the Trans-Sahara Trade Route?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Great Britain and France fail at avoiding war?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!