1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
klio [65]
2 years ago
6

This was an event that occurred on Monday, March 5, 1770 that helped spark the American Revolution.

History
2 answers:
KengaRu [80]2 years ago
7 0
The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770.
BARSIC [14]2 years ago
7 0

Answer: The Boston Massacre.

Explanation: The event that occurred on Monday, March 5, 1170 and that helped unleash the Revolution was the Boston Massacre, a confusing event in which three people lost their lives and eight were injured. The bloody event was presented by the claims of some Boston residents for the high taxes established by the English Crown on some products and the cordoning of the city by the English army, which caused great discomfort to the settlers.

You might be interested in
In the late 1800s thousands of immigrants came from what country to build farms in california
Amanda [17]
True. If that is what you were asking for?
3 0
3 years ago
How did the constitution recognize and protect slavery in states in which it was established?
ivann1987 [24]
The three-fifths compromise provided for counting slaves for representation in Congress and in the electoral college.
6 0
3 years ago
Why baking is an exact science?
djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

Baking is a both a science and an art. In any baking recipe every ingredient has a purpose. ... For example, in a cake flour gives the structure, eggs bind the ingredients, baking powder and baking soda make it rise, fats like butter and oil make it less chewy, and sugar sweetens and keeps it moist.

Explanation:

Brainliest plzzzzzzz

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone tell me the answers plz Today’s my last day of school ty no wrong answers Or I will report
CaHeK987 [17]

1. Historians

2. Artifacts

3. Fire

4. stonehenge

5. tin

6. archeologist

7. history

8. food

9. stone age

10. the past

7 0
3 years ago
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Could someone help me fill in the blanks? I really need help on this, so if you could just help me out on this, then I definitel
    11·2 answers
  • What came first, the chicken or the egg?
    11·2 answers
  • Which best explains why some plantation owners punished enslaved persons?
    6·1 answer
  • What was the Second Continental Congress created for?
    14·2 answers
  • Louis xiv had complete authority over the
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the leader of the political machine that controlled New York City in the late 1800s
    12·1 answer
  • Why were the colonies important to the British Empire?
    7·1 answer
  • Who were the boxers?
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following accurately describes a significant difference
    12·1 answer
  • I need help with this fast
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!