Answer:
Not 100% bot I'm pretty sure C
Federalism limits the power of government in the United States through the creation of two sovereign powers: the national government and state governments. In this way, it regulates the influence these have. Separation of powers establishes internal limits; it divides government against itself, giving separate functions to different branches and compelling them to share power, so neither of them becomes predominant.
By separating powers, these are split among the executive (president, vice president, Cabinet), legislative (Congress, House of Representatives and Senate), and judicial branches (Supreme Court and other courts), which are definite departments of American national government.
In Federalist No. 78, Hamilton said that the Judiciary branch of the proposed government would be the weakest of the three branches because it had "no influence over either the sword or the purse, ...It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment." Federalist No. 78 quotes Montesquieu<span>: "Of the three powers [...], the judiciary is next to nothing." There was little concern that the judiciary might be able to overpower the political branches; since Congress controlled the flow of money and the President the military, courts did not have nearly the same clout from a constitutional design standpoint. </span>
Answer:
I would say the answer is A.
Explanation:
B could make some sense, however the main goal of both these organizations was to achieve independence from Britain.
C is ridiculous.
D doesn't really make sense, they are political parties, although they could pass laws.
Answer:
Algeria's economy remains dominated by the state, a legacy of the country's socialist. Tourism, retail sales, and finance comprise more than three-quarters of GDP. In late 2016, Angola lost the last of its correspondent relationships with foreign, in the industrialized nations as well as on favorable weather conditions.
Explanation:
