1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lena [83]
3 years ago
15

Fidel Castro holds the record for the longest lived dictatorship in modern Latin America.

History
1 answer:
djverab [1.8K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Fidel Castro is the dictator that holds the record in Latin America for having the longest reign. He was leading Cuba from 1959 to 2008, whole 49 years, before he gave the power to his brother. Castro was a dictator with communist ideals, and he had absolute power in Cuba, having no institution to control his actions. Despite being a dictator, Castro actually managed to stabilize Cuba, it even though the country didn't really flourished, it had a slow but stable progress. The only other dictator in Latin America that comes somewhat close, but still far away in length of reign in a dictatorship manner is Alfredo Stroessner from Paraguay with his 35 years of rule.

You might be interested in
ASAP Please help, I am asking this question since last week. WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
Sladkaya [172]

The truth of life on the frontier was that numerous pioneers traveling westbound needed to get their lives together into wagons and make a long, risky excursion. These pioneers had single out what to carry with them and what to desert on the grounds that there was constrained space on the wagons. Numerous frontierrs likewise needed to live on a similar wagon and figure out how to utilize the space. This change was particularly hard for pioneer ladies since they despite everything needed to bring up their kids, cook, and wash garments without a lot of their gear and family unit machines. These ladies must be versatile and figure out how to do huge numbers of their equivalent tasks while being continually progressing.

The way that frontier ladies needed to forsake the homes they spent their lives making, and adjust their jobs to have the option to do the entirety of very similar things while bridging the nation isn't fundamentally the same as present day life. Going in current America has been made a lot simpler by extravagances, for example, lodgings, autos, and cafés. As a result of these extravagances, no advanced individuals should traverse the nation with the entirety of their effects in a wagon. Moving has additionally been made simpler by organizations that will move your assets for pay. This implies individuals don't have to stress over leaving an amazing majority behind while moving.

3 0
4 years ago
What was the significance of the boeing 707?
Anna [14]
The seven oh seven or aka 707 was a military plane used to transport goods and troops to any battles short distance of course because they didn't know how well the plane would do long distance til it became the first plane to carry 1,011 people across the pacific ocean and is now seen as commercial airplanes also as tanker planes. hope this helps!
7 0
3 years ago
How does the public opinion affect the big three’s decisions
chubhunter [2.5K]

Explanation:

The public affects the big three's opinion (mainly UK and US not USSR) since they are capitalists their actions reflect the people's thought and it proves their reliability as leaders, or else the public vote for other leaders.

5 0
4 years ago
Do you think America’s social programs are fair?
artcher [175]

Answer:

I don't understand what are you trying to say

3 0
3 years ago
Contrast the Massachusetts Body of Liberties to the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut.
Tanzania [10]

Answer:

Massachusetts Body of Liberties included a set of Liberties that every citizen could enjoy under the General Court.

Fundamental Orders of Connecticut included 11 orders or laws and a preamble that rendered the General Court as supreme.

Explanation:

The Massachusetts Body of Liberties and the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut were both legal frameworks established by the citizens of colonies for administrative purposes. The major difference between the two frameworks is that the Massachusetts Body of Liberties included a set of Liberties that every citizen could enjoy under the General Court. In other words, it included liberties and rights of the people as citizens of the colony.

On the other hand, the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut included 11 specific orders or laws and a preamble which provided the General Court with executive, judicial and legislative authority. It made the General Court the most supreme authority of the colony.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did Japan become open to western influence?
    15·2 answers
  • How was representation in congress to be based according to the terms of the great compromise?
    13·1 answer
  • Historia
    10·1 answer
  • To what extent does the Civil War represent a "Second American Revolution"?
    10·1 answer
  • How did women join the struggle for equal rights? What were their goals?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the worst leg of the triangular trade route
    8·1 answer
  • The second map (on the right) shows:
    6·1 answer
  • What was life like in a trading post in New Nether land?
    9·1 answer
  • Who is a better president? <br> A. Biden<br> B. Trump
    7·2 answers
  • Can someone please answer this, ill give you brainliest and your getting 100 points.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!