Populism rise to promote democratization and to have a government for the people. In Brazil, populism was used by their President Getulio Vargas to be in his place. In Argentina, the government used populism to increase wages but resulted in inflation because of instability to sustain economic reforms to people.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that it had "little-to-no effect" on trade, since gold and salt in fact allowed many of these kingdoms to profit greatly.</span></span>
Colonists had to struggle to grow enough food to meet their needs.
They could only pay back crops but they also needed food for their families.
I would go with the first one
