The correct answer would be, Philosophy is a necessary discipline.
Yes philosophy is a necessary discipline even after the progress of Science and Technology.
Explanation:
When the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality and existence is being studied, especially in academic disciplines, it is called as Philosophy.
Philosophy is something which is needed to be studied for every other educational or professional discipline in order to know the real essence or the idea behind them. When we won't understand the philosophy of anything, we won't be able to understand the thing itself.
Philosophy is a necessary Discipline, whether there is a progress in Science and Technology, Philosophy will always be a necessary unavoidable discipline because it covers the most ground of any academic discipline.
Learn more about Philosophy at:
brainly.com/question/843412
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
He just basically coined the term principle of the least interest.
Answer: The correct answer is : 25-30%
Explanation: Admissions to the emergency room related to alcohol are increasing at a faster rate than for other reasons. Alcohol-related diseases are a very important public health problem that causes care injuries and in some cases can lead to death. Alcohol consumption causes diseases such as hepatitis, pancreatitis, liver cirrhosis, dementia, among others.
Answer: The biocapacity of an ecosystem is an estimate of its production of certain biological materials such as natural resources, and its absorption and filtering of other materials such as carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Biocapacity is able to determine the human impacts on Earth. Both biocapacity and Ecological Footprint are expressed in a common unit called a global hectare (gha). In 2012, the Earth’s total biocapacity was 12.2 billion gha, or 1.7 gha per person, while humanity’s Ecological Footprint was 20.1 billion gha, or 2.8 gha per person. The Ecological Footprint is unequally distributed, with residents of high-income countries placing a disproportionate pressure on nature as they use more than their fair share of the Earth’s resources.
Explanation:
Answer:
As the judge, i would do my duty and sentence the two of them according to the severity of their crimes and past criminal record.
Explanation:
I would pass the sentence on both men as deemed by law. The length of their prison sentence is largely dependent on the past criminal record (if any) and any other factor i feel is necessary to be considered such as show of remorse and circumstances leading to the crime committed.
My judgement would in no way be affected by the length of the trial of either men. If any of them has a past criminal record, he would get a tougher sentence for being a repeated offender, if the co-defendant has no prior record, his sentence would be less because he's a first time offender.
