1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mina [271]
3 years ago
10

HELP!!

History
2 answers:
Sindrei [870]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: is A)

Explanation:

Sergio039 [100]3 years ago
7 0
A

Explicación; Hope it helps !









You might be interested in
What was life like for families on the western frontier ?
Reika [66]

Answer:

it wasnt realy good most of them either froze to death or got sick

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which actions did french kings take to increase royal power?
Nikitich [7]

Answer:

Granted town charters, introduced national tax, extended royal lands

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the overall purpose of John F. Kennedy’s inaugural speech? to warn Russia that the US will go to war if they continue t
Bas_tet [7]
The overall purpose of John F. Kennedy’s inaugural speech was "<span>to inform the nation and the world that the US is ready for war if necessary" since he wanted to inspire confidence. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain what the great compromise was? <br><br> Help me please
grin007 [14]

Answer:

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

Explanation:

Hope I helped!

3 0
2 years ago
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of moving to the northwest territory in the late 1700s. would you have taken the chance
mixer [17]
Main advantages would have been that there are bigger cities, better doctors and bigger businesses. Also if you were black, slavery wasn't allowed. Disadvantages would've been mostly political, like the fact that the economy could crash at any time. and that second part is your opinion fam
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is one nation that's most like the way it was in 1648?
    9·2 answers
  • What impact did the Columbian exchange have on Europe?
    8·2 answers
  • How are the elements of photography used in the movie coraline
    8·2 answers
  • The code of Hammurabi contributed to the development of which political idea?
    10·2 answers
  • The Iranian Revolution disrupted oil supplies around the world. Who became that nation's new leader following the revolution?
    10·2 answers
  • Why didnt bjarni and his men put ashore at the wood land that they saw
    7·1 answer
  • Who took charge of reconstructing the south after the civil war
    7·1 answer
  • What did the victors of ww2 (USA/UK/USSR/France) decide to do with Germany following the war?
    14·1 answer
  • What were the views of philosophers about bringing changes in society? DURING FRENCH REVOLUTION​
    15·1 answer
  • Which information is important to include in notes for an essay on ways the united states fought the cold war? the speech was de
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!