Answer:
I think Kamala Harris:
Explanation:
Because, Harris’ debate performance was the perfect implementation of the strategy and the perfect illustration, she was talking about the crucial question and how to slove it effectively. \
Answer:
Roosevelt, with his “big stick” policy, was able to keep the United States out of military conflicts by employing the legitimate threat of force. Nonetheless, as negotiations with Japan illustrated, the maintenance of an empire was fraught with complexity.
As a result of the Boston Tea Party, the British shut down Boston Harbor until all of the 340 chests of British East India Company tea were paid for. This was implemented under the 1774 Intolerable Acts and known as the Boston Port Act.
<span>The answer is federalism. Federalism is an arrangement of government in which a composed constitution isolates control between a focal government and provincial or sub-divisional governments. The two sorts of government act specifically upon the general population through their authorities and laws. Power is spread between at least two units with powers isolated between the parts. The quantity of branches in the administration and the way control is isolated isn't the same for all federalist governments.</span>
Economic sanctions directly impact the economy of the subjects country. Therefore a trade ban would be an economic sanction. 1 and 4 would be damaging to diplomatic relations but not the economy and 3 is military intervention which is not solely an economic action.
