Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
Answer:
The correct order of events
a1) Taxes are lowered
a2) Consumers and investors have more money
a3) Businesses prosper
a4) Businesses expand
a5) The economy grows
Explanation:
Supply side economics is an economic theory that suggested that lowering the tax to corporate, government will help in create interest in investing more to industry that will help in enhancing productivity and create jobs and eliminate inflation by slashing down prices.
This idea is an enormous piece of Ronald Reagan's financial arrangements during his administration. This turns into a focal point of "Reaganomics." He utilizes this strategy to drive the American economy during his 8 years of presidency.
The correct order of events
a1) Taxes are lowered
a2) Consumers and investors have more money
a3) Businesses prosper
a4) Businesses expand
a5) The economy grows
<span>He alleged that the US State Department had been infiltrated by communists as had Hollywood and other American institutions. This created a paranoic attitude that America was being systematically brought down from within by communists who were trying to take over the world. Consequently many American politicians argued for a stronger line to be taken on communism.</span>
I answered your question:)
