1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lesantik [10]
3 years ago
12

Why did the Kingdom of Israel split?

History
1 answer:
scZoUnD [109]3 years ago
4 0

Throughout their history in the Promised Land, the children of Israel struggled with conflict among the tribes. The disunity went back all the way to the patriarch Jacob, who presided over a house divided. The sons of Leah and the sons of Rachel had their share of contention even in Jacob’s lifetime (Genesis 37:1-11).


The enmity among the half-brothers continued in the time of the judges. Benjamin (one of Rachel’s tribes) took up arms against the other tribes (Judges 20). Israel’s first king, Saul, was of the tribe of Benjamin. When David was crowned king—David was from the tribe of Judah (one of Leah’s tribes)—the Benjamites rebelled (2 Samuel 2–3). After a long war (2 Samuel 3:1), David succeeded in uniting all twelve tribes (5:1-5).


The frailty of the union was exposed, however, when David’s son Absalom promoted himself as the new king and drew many Israelites away from their allegiance to David (2 Samuel 15). Significantly, Absalom set up his throne in Hebron, the site of the former capital (v. 10). A later revolt was led by a man named Sheba against David and the tribe of Judah (20:1-2).


The reign of David’s son Solomon saw more unrest when one of the king’s servants, Jeroboam, rebelled. Jeroboam was on the king’s errand when he met the prophet Ahijah, who told him that God was going to give him authority over ten of the twelve tribes of Israel. God’s reason for the division of the kingdom was definitive: “Because they have forsaken me . . . and have not walked in my ways.” However, God promised that David’s dynasty would continue, albeit over a much smaller kingdom, for the sake of God’s covenant with David and for the sake of Jerusalem, God’s chosen city. When Solomon learned of the prophecy, he sought to kill Jeroboam, who fled to Egypt for sanctuary (1 Kings 11:26-40).


After Solomon’s death, his son Rehoboam was set to become the next king. Jeroboam returned from Egypt and led a group of people to confront Rehoboam with a demand for a lighter tax burden. When Rehoboam refused the demand, ten of the tribes rejected Rehoboam and David’s dynasty (1 Kings 12:16), and Ahijah’s prophecy was fulfilled. Only Judah and Benjamin remained loyal to King Rehoboam. The northern tribes crowned Jeroboam as their king. Rehoboam made plans to mount an assault on the rebel tribes, but the Lord prevented him from taking that action (vv. 21-24). Meanwhile, Jeroboam further consolidated his power by instituting a form of calf worship unique to his kingdom and declaring that pilgrimages to Jerusalem were unnecessary. Thus, the people of the northern tribes would have no contact with the tribes of Judah and Benjamin.


“So Israel has been in rebellion against the house of David to this day” (1 Kings 12:19). The northern kingdom is called “Israel” (or sometimes “Ephraim”) in Scripture, and the southern kingdom is called “Judah.” From the divine viewpoint, the division was a judgment on not keeping God’s commands, specifically the commands prohibiting idolatry. From a human viewpoint, the division was the result of tribal discord and political unrest. The principle is that sin brings division (1 Corinthians 1:13, 11:18; James 4:1).


The good news is that God, in His mercy, has promised a reuniting of the northern and southern kingdoms. “He will raise a banner for the nations / and gather the exiles of Israel; / he will assemble the scattered people of Judah / from the four quarters of the earth. / Ephraim’s jealousy will vanish, / and Judah’s enemies will be destroyed; / Ephraim will not be jealous of Judah, / nor Judah hostile toward Ephraim” (Isaiah 11:12-13). When the Prince of Peace—Jesus Christ—reigns in His millennial kingdom, all hostility, jealousy, and conflict among the tribes will be put to rest.


You might be interested in
Which of the following did fifteenth- and sixteenth-century European explorers find in the Americas?
poizon [28]
It is <span>B. largely unsettled lands 
</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the victory of 1812 lead to the creation of the Monroe Doctrine?
kari74 [83]
What bictory there was only a canadian victory of the war of 1812
5 0
3 years ago
What factors contributed to the rise of political machines and their bosses? What were the positive as well as the negative aspe
OLEGan [10]
There were many factors that led to the rise of political machines in American cities in the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. One of the major factors that led to the rise of political machines was the rise of immigrant populations who sought to gain and increase their influence in the political realm and served as a powerful political tool for political machines. Political machines worked to enfranchise these voters through a system of patronage, and bribes and would bring them out on election days to support politicians who paid political bosses or awarded government privileges to. Positive aspects of this system were that it gave some increased level of representation of immigrant populations and worked to enfranchise these new political groups. However, these machines led to a high level of corruption and hurt the meritocracy of government institutions at the time. 
6 0
3 years ago
Why was it said that the “sun never sets on the British Empire”?
Tpy6a [65]

Answer:

The saying the empire on which the Sun never sets has been used to explain the vastness of the British empire. historians established that roughly 25% of the earth land mass was in control of the British. the region was so extensive that at any one time there was daylight in one of the territories.

Explanation:

Hope this helped Mark BRAINLEST!!!!!

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain this statement from the article: “Full southernization and the wealth that we now associate with northwestern Europe cam
Triss [41]

Answer:

the rise of North Western European countries began due to southernization.

Explanation:

Through this statement, the author attempts to say that the rise of North Western European countries began due to southernization. The author says that wealth and power which North-Western Europe could amass was possible because of its colonial occupation in sub and sub-tropical countries.

The capitalistic attitude of trading and exporting resources from Africa and Southern countries helped North-West European countries to grow more powerful and stronger than other European countries.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Fill in the blank <br> Laws passed by......are......to state laws
    5·1 answer
  • What is the first primeminster of pakistan
    6·2 answers
  • What Are Long Term Effect Of The Ottoman Empire's Reign
    14·1 answer
  • Which is not an essential part of the process of historical inquiry?
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! CORRECT ANSWERS ONLY PLEASE!!!
    5·1 answer
  • In 1877, one of the first and most violent strikes occurred when _____ workers held a nationwide work stoppage to protest their
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Define Divine Right.
    5·1 answer
  • 19. What are the three forms of New Federalism?
    9·2 answers
  • The photograph below shows skeletons in a mass grave
    13·1 answer
  • Was it possible to have a peaceful reconciliation after the Civil War?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!