Answer:
in 1453 sultan mehmed II of the ottoman empire conquered the Byzantine empire
Answer:
MARBURY V. MADISON
The case stems from facts that occurred in 1801, where William Marbury had been appointed as a Justice of peace but had not been commissioned. He sought the Court to mandate the Secretary of State to the commission. Issues raised were whether the plaintiff has a right to be commissioned, whether he had a right to sue for a commission in court and whether the Supreme Court has the authority to order delivery of their commission.
The Court held that while failure to commission the plaintiff was unlawful, the proper procedure to follow is to come by way of MANDAMUS. It further held that where the Legislature seeks to amend the Constitution in a way which will render it null and void, through a Legislation, it will be declared void i.e the Legislature and the Court are empowered to declare it null and void. Thus, the introduced the power of the Court to make Judicial review on legislation that is incompatible with the Constitution.
Austria-Hungary had control over Serbia, but Serbia did not like that fact. A group of terrorist Serbians called "The Black Hand" assassinated Archduke Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary to assert their frustration over them. This started opening up some of the secret alliances, and Austria-hungary and Serbia went to war. Germany was allied with Austria-hungary at the time, so they joined the fight and declared war on Russia, one of Serbia's allies. Then Germany declared war on France, who had England backing them up. Finally, Germany sank of the United States's ships (actually multiple), thus causing almost all major countries to go at war with one another.
Answer:
The Code of Hammurabi was one of the first legislative compilations of the civilized world, coming from Mesopotamia around the year 1700 BC.
This Code laid the foundations of social coexistence in Mesopotamian cities, basing its legislation on the Talion Law, by which all action required a consequence of a similar or identical nature to the contrary. Thus, there was the first documented case of retributive justice, in which people received consequences according to the actions they took.
This principle, synthesized in the phrase "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth", laid the foundations of what we now know as justice, since it gave each action a logical result. Thus, today governments apply a commutative and corrective justice evolved from this ancient way of imparting justice, but continuing with the conception that every action has a necessary consequence.
Answer:
theres no picture available to see, but the answer is Montana!!
Explanation: