Edwin Shneidman would term Hemingway a: 14. What is the ... C. death ignorer. D. death initiator. Answer: C 17. According to Shneidman, people who are ambivalent about their intent to die and whose actions. Background ... leading to death do not guarantee death (e.g., swimming in shark-infested waters) are called: 18.
The factors listed below contributed to the development of trade in the Roman Empire:
- Peace throughout the empire. This fostered the development of trade within the very vast territories of the Empire. The army, which was the largest public expenditure for the state, guaranteed protection for traders. Also a free trade region had been created inside the Empire borders.
- A shared religion throughout the empire. This entails a common cultural background, which enhanced the trustworthiness of other trades and made easier to reach agreements.
- A network of good roads. Romans are admired, even nowadays, for the amazing road system they built all over their territories. But still, technologies to build profitable means of land transport were not available at those times, and sea or river transport was still the quickest and cheapest. Specially sea transport suffered the big threaten generated by piracy. It was not always possible to confront them sucessfully.
- A common currency throughout the empire. Of course is an important factor which increase the ease of reaching trade agreements. The Roman currency consisted on gold, silver, bronze, orichalcum and copper coinage. It was introduced during the Republic times, during the third century BC, and lasted until the Empire and later.
Answer:
They all believe in something that protects them.
Answer:
The investigators were making use of the guilty knowledge test.
Explanation:
The guilty knowledge test, as the name suggests, uses the knowledge that only a perpetrator would know to test if that subject could be guilty of that crime. A polygraph examiner watches the subject's physiological arousal under the belief that certain details will provoke reactions. In this particular case, the real criminal would know that the crime was committed with a knife, not a letter opener. Therefore, if the subject being examined is the perpetrator, he will not react to "letter opener" as he will to "knife".
