1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zubka84 [21]
4 years ago
12

Long-Answer Essay Question

History
2 answers:
mafiozo [28]4 years ago
6 0

The Hindu caste system has been around for at least 3000 years and it was accepted in India as the only way for society to be. Created from the belief that society was born from the Hindu god of creation Brahma, this caste system was both hierarchical and absolutely rigid as it did not allow people from castes to either interact with each other or move. The castes were believed to derive from a person´s karma (work) and dharma (duty) and they were as follows: brahmins or intellectuals, kshatriyas, or warriors and rulers, the vaishyas, or merchants, the Shudras or laborers and finally the Dalits, or outcasts.

In contrast, we have the systems of Mesoamerica and the Andes, Mayas, Aztecs and Incas, among others, whose social structures during the periods 600 B.C.E and 1450 C.E were also composed by scaffolds, but unlike the Hindu´s these scaffolds were not rigid and immovable and they did not derive from a god, but rather, the importance for society of a person´s activities. Thus, their social strata was conformed mostly by the rulers, given their right to rule by the gods, the warriors, crafspeople, who sometimes could be as important as warriors, and finally, slaves, captured from invaded peoples.

In the case of medieval Europe, we had a society that had disbanded from the earlier Roman Empire and thus much smaller kingdoms and especially earldoms were created. In medieval european society, the top strata was formed by the nobilities and the only way to be a part of this society was through birth, exactly as it happened in Hindu society. Also, there was no mobility between the strata. After the nobility, there was the intellectuals and people whose lifestyle depended on a craft, then peasants and finally the outcasts.

In all these societies we can see a similarity; the heads of these societies are people born to the nobility of the nations and their posts cannot be earned but must be inherited. Also, they were all stratified, meaning that it was almost impossible for people to move from one strata to the other and finally, in all three there was a connection between the divinities and the way that society conformed itself.

But there are differences as well. The main one would be the level of rigidity in movement within societies and the repercussions when movement was generated. In Hindu society, social movement was, until recently, unheard of, whereas in medieval european society and the Mesoamerican and Andean societies, this was not as impossible.

kozerog [31]4 years ago
6 0

The Hindu caste system with social structures,compared to Bantu peoples in Africa civilizations in Mesoamerica and the Andes are very different.Few structures were given varying names while some were without any names which consisted of many people.

Medieval Europe's second group was not too big.The members of this group were called clergy.This clergy included people in the army and some of them higher ranks than those who lived in the lowest classes.

You might be interested in
The British defeated the Chinese and forced them to accept a new trade agreement in the
mash [69]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

first opium war ..................

6 0
3 years ago
Describe political conditions in Germany after Charlemagne empire
nexus9112 [7]
Germany crumbled into a number of small territories, each rule by a powerful noble called a duke. The dukes deliberately elected the weakest among themselves to be the “King of Germany”.
5 0
4 years ago
What does verse 5:32 suggest about the value of human life?
morpeh [17]

Answer:

The verse states, the worth of humans life, no one is allowed to murder or kill an innocent human. If someone does, he kills the entire humanity. And the one who saves a single life, he saves entire humanity.

Only those people are allowed to punish, who kills someone who is innocent or damages the State like terrorism or any other activity which is not forgivable. But this is also done in restrictions. Only judiciary or State can do this action against the culprits according to the laws.

6 0
4 years ago
6). One unique element of the Irish migration was...
Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

None of the answer are correct

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which one of the following is true about the Slave Code?
Luda [366]

Answer:

it's b. none of these answers are correct

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you were doing research on social contracts for a school project about politics, which of the following authors would you pro
    10·1 answer
  • Why might a works <br> cited list be a valuable resource to a person reading an essay
    5·2 answers
  • what was a major cause of the 11th century schism between Orthodox Church and the The Catholic Church
    6·1 answer
  • 6*4-25/25 help pleaseee
    8·2 answers
  • Help me ASAP didskdjdikdkdkd
    7·1 answer
  • Match the Cold War event with its year(s).
    8·2 answers
  • However, both attempts to settle the land failed. In 1606, a group of merchants known as the (4) _______________________________
    11·1 answer
  • When the first bomb was tested, Oppenheimer quoted from a Hindu scripture. He said “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of the
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes a special court in Louisiana?
    15·1 answer
  • Based on the excerpt, the Nazis were pursuing a policy of racial purity that developed ultimately into which event?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!