Answer:
This paper is reproduced by kind permission of the Lancet, where it first appeared as:
Bland JM, Altman DG. (1986). Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet, 346, 1085-7.
Answer:
Are exceptional athletes heroes
?
Heroics is used very broadly and can consist of many different aspects of ones= feats or achievements. While researching this topic, I have found that there are numerous ways to describe a hero. What makes a hero? I have determined in my opinion, that the word [email protected] consists of ones accomplishments, actions or service that leads to the betterment of others. From my definition of the word, exceptional athletes do have the potential to be heroes.
The word hero has been used broadly for many years. The word has found different variations of its meaning throughout a time line of history. Going back to our ancient history, the word was found primarily in literature. The word hero or heroine trails
Michael Jordan is one of the most talented athletes, but it=s beyond his talent that defines him as a hero. It is Jordan=s actions outside of the court that he has attributed. Jordan is involved with a variety of charities including the Boys & Girls Club of America, Special Olympics,UNCF/College Fund and a number of other charitable organizations that support children and families. Jordan contributes much of his time towards the youth, assisting them as individuals and athletes. His ability on the court was always backed by his actions off.
A. They have an exclusive contract to cover a particular area.
The southern state is hot. This is converted into oppressive heat in this powerful metaphor.
Hello there,
(Your CORRECT answer's are in bold.)
<span>You are writing an essay with the following organizational structure:
I. Product X
A. Cost
B. Appearance
II. Product Z
A. Cost
B. Appearance
</span><span>Which of the following best describes the organizational structure used to compare the two products?
General aspects of each subject are discussed, then the specifics.
All aspects of one subject are discussed, then the aspects of the other.
Each point of comparison is discussed in turn.
The development of each subject over a period of time is discussed.
</span>
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen
