Answer:
As per dot plots we see the distribution of prices is close but majority of prices are concentrated in different zones. So MAD would be more similar by the look.
<u>Let's verify</u>
<h3>Neighborhood 1</h3>
<u>Data</u>
- 55, 55, 60, 60, 70, 80, 80, 80, 90, 120
<u>Mean</u>
- (55*2+ 60*2+ 70+ 80*3 + 90+ 120)/10 = 75
<u>MAD</u>
- (20*2+15*2+5+5*3+15+45)/10 = 15
<h3>Neighborhood 2</h3>
<u>Data</u>
- 100, 110, 110, 110, 120, 120, 120, 140, 150, 160
<u>Mean</u>
- (100 + 110*3+ 120*3+ 140 + 150+ 160)/10 = 124
<u>MAD</u>
- (24+14*3+4*3+16*3+16+26+36)/10 = 20.4
As we see the means are too different (75 vs 124) than MADs (15 vs 20.4).
Answer:
The correct option is the graph on the bottom right whose screen grab is attached (please find)
Step-by-step explanation:
The information given are;
The required model height for the designed clothes should be less than or equal to 5 feet 10 inches
The equation for the variance in height is of the straight line form;
y = m·x + c
Where x is the height in inches
Given that the maximum height allowable is 70 inches, when x = 0 we have;
y = m·0 + c = 70
Therefore, c = 70
Also when the variance = 0 the maximum height should be 70 which gives the x and y-intercepts as 70 and 70 respectively such that m = 1
The equation becomes;
y ≤ x + 70
Also when x > 70, we have y ≤ -x + 70 with a slope of -1
To graph an inequality, we shade the area of interest which in this case of ≤ is on the lower side of the solid line and the graph that can be used to determine the possible variance levels that would result in an acceptable height is the bottom right inequality graph.
The solution to –2(8x – 4) < 2x + 5 is x > 1/6
<h3>How to solve the inequality?</h3>
The expression is given as:
–2(8x – 4) < 2x + 5
Expand
-16x + 8 < 2x + 5
Evaluate the like terms
-18x < -3
Divide both sides by -18
x > 1/6
Hence, the solution to –2(8x – 4) < 2x + 5 is x > 1/6
Read more about inequalities at:
brainly.com/question/11613554
#SPJ1
, assuming they mean pre eat values.
2.
Its 1000 cause its all zeros