What was one problem that undermined the League of Nations’ effectiveness

History

1 answer:

vladimir1956 [14]3 years ago

6 0

Best answer to that question is likely this: The League of Nations lacked strong leadership.

Explanation:

The United States never joined the League of Nations, in spite of the fact that an organization such as the League of Nations was the signature idea of US President Woodrow Wilson. He had laid out 14 Points for establishing and maintaining world peace following the Great War (World War I). Point #14 was the establishment of an international peacekeeping association. The Treaty of Versailles adopted that idea, but back home in the United States, there was not support for involving America in any association that could diminish US sovereignty over its own affairs or involve the US again in wars beyond those pertinent to the United States' own national security. The lack of involvement by the world's fastest-growing superpower, the United States, hampered its effectiveness.

The League of Nations had set out clear goals for what it intended to do. The main aims of the League were disarmament across nations, preventing war through collective security of the international community, settling disputes between countries through negotiation, and improving welfare of people around the globe. But it proved unable to meet those goals. The United Nations today has similar goals, and has been more effective in its efforts -- though there are still plenty of people who criticize the UN's effectiveness.

You might be interested in

Which of Leonardo's many accomplishments do you think is the most interesting and why?

Snezhnost [94]

Nothing cause i don't have this question

3 0

3 years ago

Which was NOT an obstacle President Lincoln had to overcome to create a naval

Nana76 [90]

Answer: D

Explanation: President Lincoln did not do anything related to the Mississippi River all he did was Patrol the East Coast all the way from Virginia South to Florida and the Gulf Coast from Florida to Texas he didn't have anything to with the Mississippi River. :-)

5 0

4 years ago

What does typhoid mary say about the boundaries between personal liberty and governments role in protecting society?

gavmur [86]

Typhoid Mary says that the government has to step in when there are people in the society who could cause harm to the bigger society in general.

<h3>What was the typhoid Mary case?</h3>

This was a case that involved a woman who knew she was sick due to the fact that she carried the Salmonella typhi.

But her continuous denial of the fact that she was ill made her think she was healthy and she infected quite a number of people.

Read more on typhoid Mary here:brainly.com/question/25179948

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

zubka84 [21]

blues music , rumba, conga, bomba, cumbia, salsa and samba

7 0

3 years ago

Imagine that an exchange student from China visits your class. While your teacher discusses how the United States has a limited

Alex787 [66]

The correct answer is that A limited government protects individual freedoms. In a totalitarian government, the government has to power to revoke any of your rights at any point (that is, if you had rights to start with). However, the United States believed in a government where the people were the government, and therefore, limited the governments power so that the people would maintain the basic human rights.

3 0

4 years ago