D I don’t know for sure but I hope it’s d
Answer:
The case is in the jury selection phase, and the trial will follow.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about a scenerio whereby Lawyers for each side of a case are questioning people who received a jury summons. The part of the trial process this describe jury selection phase and the trial will follow. During this jury selection phase, Lawyers as well as judges will proceed with selection of juries, which is “voir dire,” process, and it implies truth speaking, some questions will be asked from the potential jurors by the judge and attorneys,the question is to know their competency of serving in the case, then the next thing that will follow is the trial
Logic now
youtube.com/logicnow
Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
