Answer:
There was a series of causes leading up to the American Revolution that took place over many years, most having to do with taxation. TheMolasses Act, the Proclamation of 1763, the Currency Actand the Sugar Act, all caused resentment by restricting colonial trade and ingenuity, in order to benefit the mothercountry at the colonists' expense. The Stamp Act, however, took things to a whole new level. The Stamp Act marked Parliament's very The Stamp Actcalled for various items such as licenses, documents, diplomas and nearly every paper item to be printed on stamped or embossed paper. The paper had a tax on it and had to be bought from a government stamped-paper office. The stamp was not a stamp in the sense of a small piece of paper with glue on the back that is affixed to an envelope like we use today. Instead a more similar modern day equivalent would be the notary stamp that is used to mark official documents. A notary public takes so
Explanation:
They wanted to show the King what they were going to do. This was actually intended to gain other countries help in the Revolution. The Declaration of Independence is directed to the other countries bordering Great Britain, the colonist wanted to get as much help as they could to defeat the British and gain independence. They wanted to show the other countries and powers what was going on in the colonies, and also to promote other colonies under the British or any other power to rebel if they feel their right was stripped away.
Because they wanted to help each other
<u>Answer:</u>
Students quietly protest a political candidate by wearing black armbands.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution is not just limited to the idea of verbal speech, but it also includes the easily and clearly interpretable idea of expressive speech devoid of words.
- This refers to the unquoted freedom of expression which is ultimately a part of the freedom of speech.
- In the given scenario, though the students are not using any words to protest against the candidate, their actions are expressive enough and are protected by the right to freedom of speech.
