Answer:
yea
Explanation:
A human mind is complicated to decipher due to the fact we all have a brain thus we expirament and try to resolve day to day situations.There is real scientific proof in which provides evidence for a individual to identify themselfs as aroantic.
A psychopaths for example or a sociopath can identify themselfs as aroantic
A aroantic is a (and i quote)-"a person who experiences little or no romantic attraction to others. People identifying as aromantic can also experience romance in a way otherwise disconnected from normative societal expectations (for example due to feeling repulsed by romance, or being uninterested in romantic relationships".
The best way to see scientific proof brhind the brain of a person that identifies as a aroantic is to met one.
you should read books on what does human gestures and action really mean.
from then on you could really see actual proof of the brain behind a person that identifys themselfs as an aroantic.
Hope this helps im in 7th grade but skiped a year.
:)
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
The Heckscher-Ohlin model refers to an economic theory which states that countries will export the goods that they can produce efficiently and in large quantities while they'll import those that they are less efficient in producing.
According to the H-O theorem, the pattern of trade that exists between countries as a result of the characteristics that are possessed by the countries. In such case, a capital-abundant country can produce a capital intensive good efficiently and therefore should export the capital intensive good. Likewise, a labor-abundant country can produce labor intensive good efficiently and therefore should export the labor-intensive good.
Answer: C) Is accepted as true until proven false
==========================================================
Explanation:
We cannot prove the hypothesis to be 100% true because there might be data out there that we haven't accounted for, or some scenario that we haven't thought of yet. There's always going to be room for uncertainty and doubt. Keep in mind that such doubt does not necessarily mean that the theory is automatically false.
So all of this rules out choice A.
Choice B is ruled out as well because data supporting a hypothesis doesn't falsify the hypothesis. The term "falsify" means "to prove false" as you'd expect.
Choice C is the answer because the data seems to support the hypothesis and again we leave room for error. It's quite possible that in some unspecified date in the future, there are better methods of measurement to get a better sense of what's going on.
Choice D is ruled out because a law refers to something like the law of gravity. It's something you observe but it doesn't explain why something works. It doesn't provide the underlying mechanics of what's going on. We simply just report what we see which is exactly what an observation is.
I think it's c because depression can be genetic and environmental.
hope this helps.
Answer:
C, (1,0)
Explanation:
A perpendicular line is when 2 lines cross each other with right angles, which are 90⁰ angles. Two lines are only perpendicular when the lines slopes are negative reciprocals to each other.
To find the slope of the first graph use, (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
This is, 2-0/4+4
2/8
1/4 is the slope for the first line.
The negative reciprocal of this is -4.
We are also looking for a point on the x axis, so this eliminates answer choice A, and B, because they aren't even on the x axis.
When you test out answer choice c it will show that,
-4-0/2-1=-4/1 which is just -4.
These points on line p will pass each other when you add +4, y=-4x+4. So because of both of these lines negative reciprocating slopes, it shows that it will be answer C.
