Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Joseph Brant, a young Mohawk:___, would be, E: wanted to create an Indian confederacy between Canada and the United States.
Explanation:
Joseph Brant, also known among his people as Thayendanegea, was a member of the Iriquois League, and was born to the Mohawk tribe in 1743. To the very end, Brant defended and supported the British claim to the Americas and he was highly influential in rallying the efforts of Loyalists to the British Crown during the American Revolution. When peace between America and Britain was signed in Paris, Brant was highly disappointed with the British but still he remained loyal to the British. In the end, he and his tribe of Mohawk, as well as Loyalists to the Crown, relocated towards the region of Upper Canada, on the Grand River valley (present day Ontario). This Province was established by the British in 1791 as a place of refuge for those who had supported the British against American colonists, mostly Indian tribes.
Answer: look up the “Korematsu” case, it talks about how the 5th amendment was violated by the Japanese-American citizens being deprived of their liberty, etc... look up the amendments that were violated with the internment camps. The constitution declares the rights of the American citizens and some of the rights were broken when the Japanese were put in internment camps. Hope this helps.
Because
Explanation:
Answer:
The fight against fascism during World War II brought to the forefront the contradictions between America's ideals of democracy and equality and its treatment of racial minorities. Throughout the war, the NAACP and other civil rights organizations worked to end discrimination in the armed forces.
Answer:
The Colonists were Murdered
Explanation:
"In 1607, Captain John Smith tried to uncover what happened at Roanoke. He claimed that Chief Powhatan told him that he killed the people of the colony to retaliate against them for living with another tribe that refused to ally with him. Allegedly, Powhatan showed Smith items he took from Roanoke to support his story, including a musket barrel and a brass mortar and pestle. By 1609, this story reached England, and King James and the Royal Council blamed Powhatan for the missing colonists.
William Strachey seemed to back up the story, confirming the slaughter with his investigation in his work The Historie of Travaile Into Virginia Britannia. Powhatan claimed that he ordered the killings because there was a prophecy that he would be conquered and overthrown by people from that area. Contemporary historians and anthropologists dispute this story because there were never any bodies or archaeological evidence found to support the claim, but it has persisted for more than four hundred years.
Recently, author and researcher Brandon Fullam has reexamined Smith and Strachey’s sources and has suggested that the Powhatan massacre could have been the 15 settlers left behind from the second expedition, still leaving the mystery of Roanoke unsolved."
-History Collection
