Answer:
Consumers should not buy from companies that don't source materials
Explanation:
Companies should never have an excuse for not sourcing for their materials responsively and responsibly. They owe an ethical responsibility as well as a duty to offer their customers qualitative products at the best price and that is most sustainable to the environment.In recent times, through the widespread use of social media and the instrument of investigative journalism, it has been able to bring to the surface, the less than responsible activities of many companies in sourcing for their interest of the public and the environment.The 2006 movie "Blood Diamond" shows an avid description of how diamonds are mined and traded in the war-torn country of Sierra Leonne depicting the violation of Human and Child rights and how is excessively enriched diamond suppliers and companies.It is clear that many companies despite the public outcry for transparency in revealing their supply chain in sourcing for their materials still chose unorthodox practices. It therefore, falls on the consumers to spend their money responsibly and make smart and credible choices with their finances by refusing to buy from companies that are not transparent with their source materials.Consumers are the life-wire of any business and the hope of any business survival rests majorly on consumer satisfaction. Researches have shown that companies are no being accountable with the natural resources are utilized and have been used to cause serious harm to people and the environment. Since the companies manage to evade adequate regulations and responsibilities, it falls on the consumers to ensure that their money serves them to the greatest value.
Answer:
Seller Surplus
Explanation:
In business terms, there is a difference in the expected value what a seller expects to receive from the products it sells and from the amount it actually earns.
The cost of the product not only involves the monetary cost but it also involves the cost in terms of efforts involved to produce an article.
When a seller puts a product in the market, then he tries to have it a market value more than its cost. When such market value is realised then the difference in cost and market value is surplus for the supplier or producer.
But in cases where the consumer is efficient enough to bargain such product and only pays an amount which is less than the cost, then there arises seller deficit, which is represented as a negative seller surplus.
Snowballing her payments according to the highest interest rate or making fixed payments I'm not sure between those two
Answer:
Since half of his loss would be covered by insurance and he is not filing an insurance claim, he cannot take half of the loss.
For the half he can take, 4500, he must reduce it by 100 and then by 10% of his AGI. 4,500 - 100 - 5,000 = less than zero.
So he cannot deduct any of the loss.
Answer : R11 & U44
Explanation:
Considering the aforementioned data on the small set of products that comprise the specialty repair parts division. After performing ABC analysis on the data. I would suggest R11 and U44 for the firm keep the least control.
