I think that this is a very hard question to answer. I think that many kings, fictional or not, possess both the bad and good traits of being a king.
In regards to Macbeth, he certainly possessed the ambition many would wish for a king. He was brave, as noted by Duncan and the title of the Thane of Cawdor. He was protective, as noted by his murder of Banquo. Macbeth was even proud, as seen by his desire to keep the new title of Thane before taking the crown.
Unfortunately, many of the characteristics one would align with being a good king made Macbeth a bad king as well. Macbeth was too ambitious--as seen by his murdering Duncan. He was too protective--as seen by his inability to interpret the apparitions warnings in the correct way. Lastly, he was too proud--as seen by his refusal to leave the castle as Birnam Wood "moved" against him.
Like anything, one must always have control. Too much of anything normally turns out to be a bad thing. Therefore, depending upon one's individual views, Macbeth could be both a bad king or a good one.
BTW: It's free real estate.
Answer:
The best in this kind are but shadows" is <em><u>C.Bottom talking about his fellow craftsmen.</u></em>
Explanation:
<em><u>"The best in this kind are but shadows" isA. Demetrius talking about the women he has lowed in the pastB. Titania talking about men.C.Bottom talking about his fellow craftsmen.D. Theseus talking about plays.</u></em><em><u>The best in this kind are but shadows, and the worst are no worse, if imagination amend them. A Midsummer Night's Dream, Act 5, Scene 1.</u></em><em><u>It means that the best play is only a shadow (a limited outline or imitation of life), and the worst play no worse (than the shadow, or than the play put on by the rude mechanicals).</u></em>
The dog ate our Thanksgeving dinner
