1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wolverine [178]
4 years ago
11

Compare the historical view on hemispheric specialization with the current perspective of hemispheric specialization. What type

of research occurred to propel this change in perspective?
History
2 answers:
Andrews [41]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Left hemisphere was seen as prevailing. Right hemisphere was seen as basically futile. Presently the left side hemisphere is known to have practical experience in verbal procedures and the privilege is known to have some expertise in nonverbal procedures. Split cerebrum medical procedure impelled this change in imminent

Explanation:

Truly, specialists guaranteed that the left half of the globe was the overwhelming hemisphere where all higher cerebrum capacities, for example, thinking and critical thinking, occurred. The correct side hemisphere was by and large seen as having no extraordinary capacities or abilities. The present point of view on hemispheric specialization guarantees that the left hemisphere is better at verbal handling undertakings, while the correct hemisphere is better at nonverbal preparing errands. Research including the impacts of split-mind medical procedure is the thing that pushed this adjustment in context.

sergij07 [2.7K]4 years ago
3 0
My answer is <span>- of or relating to nerve pathways that cross the cerebral cortex of the brain</span>
You might be interested in
who wrote "there can be no right to strike against the public safety by anybody , anywhere , anytime"?
mihalych1998 [28]
The governor of massachusetts

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct answer.
iren2701 [21]

Answer:

the answer is c

Explanation:

because in that time was the creat push.

3 0
3 years ago
Select three events between 1765 and 1776 that you regard as critical turning points along the path from protest to revolution,
MAXImum [283]
What are the answer choices?

6 0
3 years ago
(5-7 sentences for each question)
miv72 [106K]

Answer:

1. With his conquest of England in 1066, William I secured for himself and his immediate successors a position of unprecedented power. He was able to dominate not only the country but also the barons who had helped him win it and the ecclesiastics who served the English church. He forced Pope Alexander II to be content with indirect control over the church in a land that the papacy hitherto had regarded as bound by the closest ties to Rome. William’s son Henry I—whose accession (1100) was challenged by his eldest brother, Robert, duke of Normandy—was compelled to make concessions to the nobles and clergy in the Charter of Liberties, a royal edict issued upon his coronation. His successor, Stephen (1135), whose hold on the throne was threatened by Henry I’s daughter Matilda, again issued a solemn charter (1136) with even more generous promises of good government in church and state. Matilda’s son Henry II also began his reign (1154) by issuing a solemn charter promising to restore and confirm the liberties and free customs that King Henry, his grandfather, had granted “to God and holy church and all his earls, barons and all his men.” There developed, in fact, through the 12th century a continuous tradition that the king’s coronation oath should be strengthened by written promises stamped with the king’s seal.

2.

 Rome needed money to run.  

The Republic needed money to pay the legions, to build roads, sewers, aqueducts, and arenas, and to pay for the welfare programs that fed the poor.  To get this money Rome created a system called tax farmers.

A tax farmer was a person who bought the right from the Senate to tax all the people and business in a certain area.  The biggest problem with this system is that the senate didn't set up any controls on the tax farmers.  They didn't say how much taxes were, or who got taxed.  They left all that up to the tax farmer.

Tax farming was a business, and the tax farmers were in it to make a profit.  While most Romans were willing to pay taxes, and even allow the tax farmer some profit, many of the tax farmers went way beyond what people expected.  Many of them saw this as a way to get rich.  Plus, since the tax farmer decided who got taxed and who didn't, you could bribe the tax farmer to make your taxes low or maybe tax your competitors out of business, or if you had enough bribe money, maybe both.  If a Roman citizen didn't pay their taxes at whatever amount the tax farmer set, you and your entire family could be sold into slavery.

Even with the tax farmer system, the Roman government wasn't getting enough money and Rome was going broke.

2.  Elected officials were corrupt.  

Under Roman law you could pay someone to vote for you.  So rich people could actually buy their way into the senate.  Once in the Senate, there were many ways to get huge amounts of money.  Remember the tax farmer?  Since they bought the position from the Senate, the Senate set the amount it cost and decided who actually got the job.  Plus the Senate decided who got to build the roads, arenas etc.  So construction companies bribed the Senate to get the construction contracts.  Finally since the Senate made all the laws, people could bribe senators to make laws that they wanted.  The Government of the Republic was rife with corruption and graft.

3.  Rome was riddled with crime.  Criminals ran wild in Rome.  Since there was no police force, there was no one to stop them.  It was not safe to walk the streets without a guard.  Wealthy Romans hired guards and even built their own small armies to protect their homes and families.  This led to further problems when the guards of one wealthy family fought the guards of another family over insults or business territories.  The Senate couldn't do anything since there was no money to hire police or even create a militia.

There were other problems in Rome to add to these.  Senators didn't trust each other, and they really didn't trust the legions.  They even passed laws making it illegal for a legion to enter Rome.  Rome was a disaster.  The people of Rome were tired of the mess and wanted the problems solved and the corruption ended.  Julius Caesar told the people of Rome that he could solve all of Rome's problems.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“The measure of the poverty of a nation is marked by that of the degree it which it neglects and abandons the care of its own in
kirza4 [7]

Answer:

to use the national governments resources to support business growth in the US

Explanation:

According to the above quote, the speaker talks about the government protecting its industries from foreign powers, nationalising the industries and supporting local growth.

Based on this quote, Henry Clay proposes that the goal of his American System is to use the national governments resources to support business growth in the US

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • the british navy continued their practice of___ of american sailors, causing an international crisis​
    9·2 answers
  • What country has begun offering African nations money for roads, railways, and schools with relatively few strings attached in o
    15·1 answer
  • The Freedom Summer campaign led to
    11·2 answers
  • What was the first successful colonial independence movement against A European power, 1775-1783
    5·1 answer
  • Why was Valley Forge significant to the American Revolutionary War victory? A It allowed the French to attack the British in Can
    6·2 answers
  • What European had the best claim on the americas
    10·1 answer
  • 21. What was the name of the British policy that allowed the colonies to govern themselves? ​
    7·2 answers
  • What was the major weakness of the Articles of Confederation?
    12·1 answer
  • The US Civil War is often considered by many historians to be the world’s first “modern era” war. In what ways might this be tru
    11·1 answer
  • The ilkhanate of the mongol empire was a state that was established in:.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!