The narrator, George Orwell, thought that "it would be murder to shoot an elephant." When he found the elephant, he did not want to kill it because he thought that it was no longer dangerous. But he still kills it because of the want to be a part or liked by the society. In short, he was "peer-pressured" by the people.
Answer:
the answer to your question is the second option
Explanation:
brainley would be appreciated
Answer: The statement above could be viewed in two (2) perspective:
1. NO! Proctor did not die with his goodness in the circumstance that for as many that he has been good towards could in turn reciprocate the good nature. That would mean his goodness did not die with him.
2. YES! Proctor died with his goodness if on the long run there is no one that could measure with his good nature. Then his goodness did die with him.
Explanation: The statement Elizabeth made could either be True or False depending on the future factors and happenings.
Bodies are race cars and need to be cared for in order to perform well
Answer:
It is effective.
Explanation:
The claim is ineffective because it does not state a clear position.
It does state a clear position, (students should wear uniforms)
The claim is ineffective because it expresses a first person preference.
No mention of a first person preference in this statement.
The claim is ineffective because it suggests the essay will inform rather than argue.
It's rather clear the the person will argue for their claim, rather than inform the reader.
So by default, the answer must be that it is effective.
