Supporting the nomination of William Jennings Bryan as a democrat was both a positive and negative development for the People’s Party.
<u>Explanation:</u>
People’s party was found by the leaders of the Populist Movement which worked to safeguard the rights of farmers. It was formed in 1891 and in the presidential elections of 1892 its candidate James B Weaver got 8.5% votes. This attracted political attention towards the people’s party.
Democrats were impressed by the ideals and support gained by the People’s party they succeeded in gaining the support of People’s party in 1896 presidential elections when William Jennings Bryan was the Democrat candidate. Getting folded up to the Democratic Party increased the political exposure of People’s party.
The fusion wasn’t a healthy decision considering the scenario in the south. Approaches of Democrats were completely racist which meant there was a conflict between ideologies between the two parties. The influence of People’s Party was over by 1908.
They gained control over many byzantine trade routes. The first is your answer
Personally, I don't think so.
Every information we have is by principle, biased. We can never have a full picture on the issue (we don't live long enough to have ALL the information and all the other people's opinions) so this means that we only know a selection of relevant information. This selection biases our perception of the issue: so in this way, I think that we are bound to be at least a little bit biased.
The answer is: The middle colonies experienced economic growth as cities such as New York and Philadelphia became centers of trade.
When both new york and Philadelphia become the centers of trade, a lot of investors became interested to inject their capital into these two cities.
This created a lot of job opportunities in both of these cities, making the middle colonies around them to experience massive economic growth and increase in the number of modern infrastructures.
