All categories

3 years ago

FREE POINTS!!!!!! Enjoy :33333333

Mathematics

2 answers:

Lelechka [254]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

ok thanks i guess

Step-by-step explanation:

Allisa [31]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:33,333,333 is thirty three million three hundred thirty three thousand and three hundred thirty three.

Step-by-step explanation:

Numbers

You might be interested in

There are 11 horses in a race.

Shkiper50 [21]

11 nCr 3 plugged in a calculator will equal 165 Combinations/Positions

6 0

3 years ago

I'll give brainliest if you show your work. Plz answer quickly.

Maslowich

Answer:

C) In step 3, he should have determined which square is closest to 18.

Step-by-step explanation:

17.64 also rounds to 18. 17.64 differs from 18 by ...

18 -17.64 = 0.36

whereas 18.49 differs from 18 by ...

18.49 -18 = 0.49

Hence 17.64 is closer to 18 and we might expect 4.2 to be closer to √18 than is 4.3.

___

The actual root of 18 is about 4.243, so 4.2 is a better approximation.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help worth 20 points! (this is legit my math grade .-.)

Natasha2012 [34]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a true

b false

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The width of a rectangular rug is 6 feet if the perimeter is 24 feet what is the area of the rug?

babymother [125]

Answer:

36 feet squared

Step-by-step explanation:

Finding the perimeter of an object is adding all of the sides together. If the width of the rug is 6 feet then we know that there are two sides that length. Add those together.

6 feet + 6 feet = 12 feet

You would subtract the number you get from the perimeter.

24 feet - 12 feet = 12 feet

And then divide the number by the number of sides left, 2, to get each of their lengths.

12 feet / 2 feet = 6 feet

To find the area of a rectangle you multiply length times width, which in this case both are 6 feets.

6 feet x 6 feet = 36 feet squared

6 0

3 years ago

A survey of 1,562 randomly selected adults showed that 522 of them have heard of a new electronic reader. The accompanying techn

tester [92]

Answer:

a) We want to test the claim that 35% of adults have heard of the new electronic reader, then the system of hypothesis are.:

Null hypothesis: $p=0.35$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.35$

And is a two tailed test

b) $z=\frac{0.334 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{1562}}}=-1.326$

c) $p_v =2*P(z$

d) Null hypothesis: $p=0.35$

e) Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

n=1562 represent the random sample selected

X=522 represent the people who have heard of a new electronic reader

$\hat p=\frac{522}{1562}=0.334$ estimated proportion of people who have heard of a new electronic reader

$p_o=0.35$ is the value to verify

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

$p_v$ represent the p value

Part a

We want to test the claim that 35% of adults have heard of the new electronic reader, then the system of hypothesis are.:

Null hypothesis: $p=0.35$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.35$

And is a two tailed test

Part b

The statistic for this case is given :

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

Replacing the info given we got:

$z=\frac{0.334 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{1562}}}=-1.326$

Part c

We can calculate the p value using the laternative hypothesis with the following probability:

$p_v =2*P(z$

Part d

The null hypothesis for this case would be:

Null hypothesis: $p=0.35$

Part e

The best conclusion for this case would be:

Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.

5 0

3 years ago