Answer:Weak,Inductive,Uncogent
Explanation:This tries to compare Sierra Nevada mountain range and the island of Jamaica are both popular tourist destinations.
The conclusion made by this statement is WEAK, INDUCTIVE AND UNCOGENT.
The information about the bringing of Ski equipment when traveling to Jamaica in February is not a strong, deductive and cogent conclusion as both areas are not exactly the same as stated by the write up.
A conclusion is said to be weak when it does not have strong evidence to back it up,it is said to be inductive if it is not fully supported by the premise and it is said to be Uncogent when the argument is not clear and believable.
Juan attributes his high score on a difficult exam to his intelligence, based on attribution theory.
<h3 /><h3>What is Attribution theory?</h3>
It corresponds to a psychological theory that justifies how the individual is able to interpret everyday situations internally and externally, that is, to judge how their behavior and the behavior of other individuals occur.
Therefore, Juan used internal attribution, that is, a skill, as a factor that justified his test score.
Find out more about Attribution theory here:
brainly.com/question/6654060
Answer: D. One is money earned each week from work; the other is money already saved :)
Explanation:
Luther was very much against the practice of indulgence, which granted pardon for certain sins if the people paid the church. He felt that it was wrong to relieved and forgiven by God through a monetary based contribution. Also, he felt that the Pope did not carry the right to grant a pardon for people, and that they should have to undergo the same steps towards repentance just like everyone else.
D. (on USA Testprep).....<span><span><span><span>American youth became active in trying to change the culture and government policies through voting and other measures. </span></span></span></span>
