This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question
Based on your reading of the Challenger case, do you think the advocacy or inquiry approach dominated the decision-making process?
Answer: advocacy approach
Explanation:
The fact that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) had dismissed probabilistic risk analyses has been pointed out as the main cause of the Challenger catastrophe. In this case, advocacy dominated the inquiry approach, as management didn´t allow further inquires in probabilistic risk analysis, prioritizing the design-oriented approach that predominated in NASA during the 1970s.
The type of design the school administrator is using is known an non-equivalent control group design.
The school administrator said he wants to compare records of a school that has no lockers with that of a school that has lockers. Hence, the answer to this question is non equivalent control group.
A non equivalent control group is a treatment group and a control group which are measured and compared after getting data from both groups at the beginning and at the end of a research program.
To know more about locker visit:
brainly.com/question/4283711
#SPJ4
Answer:
Categorical Imperative; Immanuel Kant
Explanation:
Kant´s moral theory - influenced by the French Enlightenment Rationalism is based on the central idea that the only intrinsically good thing is a good will which is subject to the moral law.
The Categorical Imperative is his construction of moral law, following the principle of universalizability (applied to all people) and that of humanity - never treat other humans as a means to an and. It is therefore not surprising that Feminism used this part of Kantian Perspective on Ethics to condemn certain practices regarding women, because they treat women as means.
Brainiest of the brainiest brains.
