All categories

3 years ago

Yates Company shows the following unit costs for its product:

Business

1 answer:

Molodets [167]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

b. greater under absorption costing than variable costing.

Explanation:

The question is to calculate the closing value of inventory and based on the choices, we need to calculate based on both the Absorption Costing and the Variable Costing Methods.

1. Closing Inventory based on Variable Costing Method

Direct Material $40

Direct Labour $30

Variable Overhead $2

Fixed Overhead <u>$0 </u>(this method does not reecognise fixed cost

Totals (Unit cost of Production) $72

Based on this, the closing inventory is $72 x (8,000+50,000-55,000 units)

=$77 x 3,000= $216,000

2. Closing Inventory based on Absorption Costing Method

Direct Material $40

Direct Labour $30

Variable Overhead $2

Fixed Overhead <u>$5</u>

Totals (Unit cost of Production) $77

Based on this, the closing inventory is $77 x (8,000+50,000-55,000 units)

=$77 x 3,000= $231,000

Based on these calculations:

The Ending Inventory is higher/Greater under absorption costing than variable costing and the reason is that variable costing does not recognize fixed cost in determining the value of ending inventory.

You might be interested in

Wither Spoon Company requires a new manufacturing facility. It found three locations; all of which would provide the needed capa

suter [353]

Answer:

$42,500 payments at the beginning of each of the next twenty-five years. Assuming Wither Spoon Company's borrowing costs are 8% per annum

Explanation:

Assuming Wither Spoon Company's borrowing costs are 8% per annum

th e option that is least costly to the company is Location C because it only requires $42,500 payments at the beginning of each of the next twenty-five years.

Hence Location A which may be purchased immediately for $500,000 cash and Location B which may be acquired with an immediate down payment of $100,000 and annual payments of $39,900 at the end of each of the next twenty years are not the best option for the company to choose from which therefore makes LOCATION C the best option for Wither Spoon Company because it save cost as as well the least costly to the company.

6 0

3 years ago

Current news and politics is full of concern about the environment, particularly as it is related to oil use and the auto indust

alina1380 [7]

Answer:

It is true that raising gasoline prices (either by producing less of it, or by adding taxes) would reduce gasoline use. The concept of price elasticity of demand can helps us explain why.

Explanation:

A good can be either elastic or inelastic depending on its price elasticity of demand. A price elasticity of demand of less than 1 is considered inelastic, while a price elasticity of demand higher than 1 is considered elastic.

Elastic goods are those whose quantity demanded falls or rises more than the price. Inelastic goods are those whose quantity demanded falls or rises less than the price.

Gasoline is a inelastic good in the short-term because even with a price hike, most people will still buy gasoline because they need to move around. However, in the long-term, gasoline becomes more elastic because people replace their buy electric cars, or cars that use less fuel, etc.

What this tells us is that raising gasoline prices can reduce gasoline use in the long-term.

A built-in injustice in this measure is that it affects the poor disproportionally. Poor people also need cars to get around, and a rise in the gasoline price means that they have less money for other basic needs.

8 0

3 years ago

When the price is $12 the quantity demanded is 50. When the price increases to $24 the quantity demanded decreases to 30. Calcul

Allushta [10]

Answer:

PED = -0.4 or |0.4| in absolute terms

Explanation:

price elasticity of demand (PED) = % change in quantity demanded / % change in price

% change in quantity demanded = [(30 - 50) / 50] x 100 = -40%
% change in price = [($24 - $12) / $12] x 100 = 100%

PED = -40% / 100% = -0.4 or |0.4| in absolute terms

the demand is price inelastic since |0.4| < 1

this means that the change in quantity demanded is proportionally less than the change in price.

6 0

2 years ago

An increasingly important advantage of the limited liability company is that its members?

victus00 [196]

An increasingly important advantage of the limited liability company is that its members are "able to deduct its operating losses against the member's regular revenue to the extent permitted by law".

<h3>What do you mean by limited liability company?</h3>

A Limited Liability Company (LLC) is refers to as a type of organization in which the members of that company is not liable for the losses occur in the business. The duties and responsibilities regarding losses are restricted here.

Adding to it, that means if the company fails to pay off its losses or debts to creditors, the personal assets of the members will not be added while paying the debt.

It is an enterprise structure that is the combination of the pass-thru taxation that is related to a partnership or sole proprietorship along with the rules of the company.

The main advantage of this type of company is that the members of that LLC can reduce their all operating losses like travelling, insurance, office supplies, payroll etc.

Moreover, the other benefits of Limited liability company include that this is more flexible than the other corporations and it provides different rights, classes and preferences to their members or managers.

Learn more about limited liability company, refer to the link:

brainly.com/question/3521418

#SPJ4

8 0

1 year ago

how goods are produced often affects an entire society. natural resources, we have learned, are limited. while some natural reso

vlada-n [284]

While overuse of fossil fuels will cause pollution, world without them is also difficult. A balance is required.

Explanation:

Without fossil fuels vehicle transport for conveyance does not happen, food won't be transported, and thus life may come to standstill. It will take sometimes, centuries for the alternative sources to replace fossil fuels.
Overuse will cause pollution to happen and the fossil fuels getting depleted. We already found that if fossil fuels are not there, world will come to standstill. Therefore, cannot deplete them.
Balanced usage, usage with caution, and development of alternative sources are the ways to tackle the problem. These are the implications of the statements.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers