1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirill115 [55]
2 years ago
10

Describe two benefits and two challenges of transitioning to a democratic form of government.

History
1 answer:
sammy [17]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In modern political thought, there are two approaches to the justification of democracy as the best system of government: value-based and rationally utilitarian. Value justifications regard democracy as a value in itself, as a political system that most fully embodies the most important humanistic values: freedom, equality, justice, etc.

The value approach is criticized primarily for its appeal to a democratically minded person who is truly striving for freedom and political equality. However, in the modern world, very many people, if not most, prefer not freedom (which they often perceive even as anti-value), but material well-being, security, and order. Therefore, they put a non-political, social meaning in the most respected values ​​of equality and justice, linking them to ensuring equal opportunities in life or rewarding merit, to which real democracy has a very weak relationship. All this casts doubt on the value group of arguments in favor of democracy.

A rational-utilitarian approach does not deny the certain significance of the value justifications of democracy, but at the same time pushes them to the background. This approach interprets democracy primarily as the most rational, useful way for citizens to organize a political system, allowing them to articulate and harmoniously combine their interests. The most consistently rational-utilitarian group of arguments is expressed in the systemic justifications of democracy: Democracy helps to prevent the rule of dictators, curb power, guarantee the protection of citizens from state arbitrariness; Democracy provides a higher level of economic development and higher rates of economic growth.

Of course, democracy, like any other political system, is not free from serious shortcomings, which, in fact, represent a continuation of its merits. Usually attention is paid to the following weaknesses of democracy:

1. The threat of destabilization of the political system arising from the very principle of election.

2. Political competition can result in conflictogenicity, confrontation, open clashes and, therefore, destabilization of the situation in society.

3. The danger of the tyranny of the majority, confident in its "rightness" and suppressing the will of those who remain in the minority.

4. Possible unprofessionalism of officials elected by an incompetent majority.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which best describes an overall effect of the Harlem Renaissance? A.The Harlem Renaissance spread European culture to African Am
Sedbober [7]

Answer:

B. The Harlem Renaissance spread African American culture to white Americans.

Explanation:

The Harlem Renaissance was a time where black culture thrived. Black artists greatly gained recognition for their work around the country. This later helped to set the stage for the Civil Rights Movement.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the watergate scandal important
Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

idk i just need points ;|

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why wasn’t everyone in ancient civilizations equal
marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

different area different way of life

Explanation:

many civilizations were far apart and vary on difficulty on life

4 0
3 years ago
This man gained political support by providing jobs and services to both immigrants and African Americans.
abruzzese [7]

b. James Pendergast

James Pendergast was a Democratic politician and the first Big City Boss of Kansas City, Missouri. He presented himself as an advocate for the common working man, which boosted his political base. He helped people find jobs and provided food


4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
compare the goals of these progressives with the goals of walter rauschenbusch and the social gospel movement.​
Serjik [45]

The Social Gospel Movement originated during the second half of the 19th century. Its main ideas that good actions led to salvation, as people must emulate the life of Jesus Christ in their day to the activities. American Theoolgist Walter Rauschenbusch was one of the main representatives of this movement.

On the other hand, the progressive movement proposed the idea that of improving society by implementing reforms in education, safety and health that would lead to people's overall well-being, as this was seen as the ultimate goal of progressivism.

The difference between the two movements resides in the fact that the Social Gospel Movement encouraged good acts in the name of Christ, while Progressivism encouraged good efforts for the good of mankind, regardless of any belief.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the xyz affair
    15·2 answers
  • What is popular sovereignty?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the renaissance different from the middle ages?
    11·1 answer
  • You have just read a news article that discusses the closing of two fast food restaurants in a small French town in the country
    15·1 answer
  • What are the ways in which Native Americans told their stories?
    10·1 answer
  • Hey guys I want to know who yall voted for?? let meee know Biden or trump?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is best associated with John D. Rockefeller?
    9·1 answer
  • An alien civilization has different names and symbols for six elements. Place each element in the correct location in the
    7·1 answer
  • Please make these events in order 50 Points worth it.
    5·1 answer
  • What did Marie Antoinette represent before her execution
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!