1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
spin [16.1K]
4 years ago
7

What did the supreme court say in its ruling in regents of the university of california v. bakke

History
2 answers:
Fofino [41]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The University of California School of Medicine implemented a program whereby sixteen students belonging to racial minorities were to be admitted for each class of one hundred students. With this aim it used a regular program according to which applicants were rejected with an average of less than 2.5 points and a special one in which that score did not apply. A white aspirant whose applications were rejected on two occasions, promoted demand because the special program had admitted candidates who had obtained a score lower than his. He founded his claim in the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court of California considered that such a system was illegal and ordered the admission of the plaintiff. Once the documents have been sent to the Supreme Court of the United States, it partially confirmed the sentence: although admitting positive discrimination as a way to equalize opportunities and generate equity in cases where inequality is evident, this does not prevent that this type of measures must be equitable for all groups. Therefore, as this measure by the University of California generated injustices based on a positive action measure, it was declared unconstitutional and Bakke's admission was ordered.

Gelneren [198K]4 years ago
4 0
Essentially it said that affirmative action does not violate the Constitution and that racial quotas are necessary to prevent discrimination. 
You might be interested in
What was the problem in England amongst the poor and why would the Americas
zhannawk [14.2K]
Because they were cute
3 0
2 years ago
The amendment process would allow state governments to nullify federal law
marta [7]

Answer:

The rights of citizens would be better protected by having both federal and state levels of government.

Hope this helps!

8 0
3 years ago
John eats a bowl of cornflakes and become sick later he discovers of the Box of cornflakes was accidentally contaminated he seek
Anestetic [448]
I think it’s A. Civil
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the House have sole power to do?​
erastova [34]

Answer:

One

Explanation:

0

3 0
3 years ago
HELP
raketka [301]
1. Is a stock market crash
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What kind of ecological disaster would have to take place in order to make your home unlivable?
    8·1 answer
  • Who controlled the most territory bordering the louisiana purchase? spain france great britain mexico?
    8·2 answers
  • Define recess appointments
    9·2 answers
  • Why did new towns spring up in places that were not near rivers or canals?
    7·2 answers
  • What was a primary challenge faced by the Jamestown colonists during the first few years
    9·2 answers
  • What did Spanish Colonists do when they set up colonies in North America?
    8·1 answer
  • What did many Anti-Federalists fear about the new constitution? A. It was too democratic. B. It was not a republican document. C
    7·2 answers
  • What was john quincy adams role in the amistad case
    9·2 answers
  • What did the British government do to the colonists?
    10·1 answer
  • Choose all that apply to the characteristics of the Roman Republic.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!