1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
spin [16.1K]
3 years ago
7

What did the supreme court say in its ruling in regents of the university of california v. bakke

History
2 answers:
Fofino [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The University of California School of Medicine implemented a program whereby sixteen students belonging to racial minorities were to be admitted for each class of one hundred students. With this aim it used a regular program according to which applicants were rejected with an average of less than 2.5 points and a special one in which that score did not apply. A white aspirant whose applications were rejected on two occasions, promoted demand because the special program had admitted candidates who had obtained a score lower than his. He founded his claim in the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court of California considered that such a system was illegal and ordered the admission of the plaintiff. Once the documents have been sent to the Supreme Court of the United States, it partially confirmed the sentence: although admitting positive discrimination as a way to equalize opportunities and generate equity in cases where inequality is evident, this does not prevent that this type of measures must be equitable for all groups. Therefore, as this measure by the University of California generated injustices based on a positive action measure, it was declared unconstitutional and Bakke's admission was ordered.

Gelneren [198K]3 years ago
4 0
Essentially it said that affirmative action does not violate the Constitution and that racial quotas are necessary to prevent discrimination. 
You might be interested in
this is my religion. This I what I live for.
Neporo4naja [7]

Answer:

ok...

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement accurately summarizes the differences between the peace
iragen [17]

Answer:

The statement that summarizes accurately the differences between the peace parting from democrats and the war democrats is:

Even though former president lincoln military policies' were not the best to guarantee peace, it was the only one available after the situation the country lived. Thus, the democrat party was divided into a side that supported former president lincoln and one that supported George McLellan. Thus, when Lincoln won, many democrats that didn't support former president Lincolns' military policies became republicans and they fought for a separation of the confederation from the federation.

Explanation:

Democrats were divided in two groups as a cause of former president Lincoln military policies. But his win in the 1864 election, launch them to his opposition. Then, the confederation made its move and the scalations originated the civil war. This late group that didn't support former president lincoln military policies' was called copperheads.

4 0
2 years ago
Help me in this please ​
Rina8888 [55]

I don't really know that much about history but I will try my best to help you

5 0
3 years ago
Pleeeeese help me!!!!!!
givi [52]
The correct answer to this is Christianity
4 0
2 years ago
What was Reconstruction?
Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

B. The rebuilding of everything that was damaged in the war

Explanation:

Reconstruction basically means rebuilding if I'm not wrong, so they are reconstructing things that were damaged

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The practice of foretelling the future is called
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following best c best describes the effect of the Vietnam War on the US economy
    7·1 answer
  • Which European countries explored and colonized in the Americas?
    15·2 answers
  • Differences between Cherokee constitution and US constitution?
    14·1 answer
  • Explain why the majority of people in Europe supported Appeasement in 1930s
    15·1 answer
  • On one hand Britain in the 1930s was?
    15·1 answer
  • Marry me? plz i will pay
    11·2 answers
  • "Third Parties" are MOST successful in __
    9·2 answers
  • Which statement describes how a woman rolls change after a world war II
    8·1 answer
  • How does Columbus describe the people of Hispaniola? List at least three pieces of evidence from the passage.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!