1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OLEGan [10]
3 years ago
5

How were debates and legislation in Congress prior to the Civil War similar to what happens today? How were they different? Draw

a connection and cite evidence of your connection.
History
1 answer:
KATRIN_1 [288]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The compromise admitted California as a free state and did not regulate slavery in the remainder of the Mexican cession all while strengthening the Fugitive Slave Act, a law which compelled Northerners to seize and return escaped slaves to the South.The Compromise of 1850 pacified the nation for only a short time. In the end, neither the North nor the South was truly happy with the agreement, and both sides grew increasingly agitated and bitter about the state of affairs.For nearly a century, the people and politicians of the Northern and Southern states had been clashing over the issues that finally led to war: economic interests, cultural values, the power of the federal government to control the states, and, most importantly, slavery in American society.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Explore and Discuss
melomori [17]

Answer:

Considering these questions:

1. What if Napoleon had never been born? (In what ways would history have been different? Do you think someone else would have done what Napoleon did? Why?)

<em />

<em>a. If Napoleon was never born, someone else would have been born to undertake his roles but not in exact ways because nature abhors vacuum.</em>

<em>b. History would have been different because no two persons are the same and are created to perform exactly the same roles in nature. They might undertake similar ventures but not exactly the same at the given time.</em>

<em> c. Yes someone else would have done what Napoleon did but in his own way. As earlier said no two persons are the same with the same mission. </em>

2. The French Revolution began as a struggle for the rights of the people against a single ruler with all the power. It ended by giving all power to another single ruler. Why do you think that happened?  

Answer: It happened because the Public cannot be King, it is only a person that shall be given the people's mandate to lead the others. The only thing the people abhor or do not tolerate is high-handedness of a ruler not a leader. No leader is an absolute, that was why we should not allow too much power to be concentrated in an individual because of abuse. L<em>ord Acton said " Power corrupts but absolute Power corrupts absolutely."</em>

8 0
3 years ago
What effect did the ruling have on legislative precedent?
Phoenix [80]

Answer:

The Importance of Precedent. In a common law system, judges are obliged to make their rulings as consistent as reasonably possible with previous judicial decisions on the same subject. ... Each case decided by a common law court becomes a precedent, or guideline, for subsequent decisions involving similar disputes.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
According to Paine section three of Common Sense, what is the only type of government that can prevent war?
andre [41]

Answer: the answer is definitely D!!

Explanation: In Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, he basically explains the only way a peaceful people can exist in harmony; and that is through creating a republic.

8 0
3 years ago
Name two rights that John Locke discussed.
olganol [36]

Answer:

Among these fundamental natural rights, Locke said, are "life, liberty, and property." Locke believed that the most basic human law of nature is the preservation of mankind. To serve that purpose, he reasoned, individuals have both a right and a duty to preserve their own lives.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Which statement BEST describes conditions in the United States as it entered the
Lilit [14]
The answer is most likely- the British were disregarding our rights on the seas by seizing our sailors
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What motivated imperialist to seek possession or control of colonies
    6·1 answer
  • The system of ranching common in Texas was introduced by the __________.
    6·2 answers
  • 2
    12·1 answer
  • I need help on category #10 &amp; #11 plz help i’ll give u a brainlest
    7·1 answer
  • How did the beginning of bilingual education in the 1960s change the curriculum of some Texas schools?​
    15·2 answers
  • Who was the first woman appointed to the supreme court
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT a reason why the Soviet Union collapsed?
    12·1 answer
  • What was ONE new belief that John Calvin had that inspired him to be part
    14·1 answer
  • What was Nehemiah a leader of?
    8·1 answer
  • What was difficult for the National Assembly after it won power in France?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!