1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
antiseptic1488 [7]
3 years ago
15

How does the comment by the observer reflect the Jesuits' effects on Native Americans?

History
1 answer:
sukhopar [10]3 years ago
6 0

The observer emphasized a negative impression against the Jesuits’ effects on Native Americans based on the old natives whom he spoke about how they regretted the presence of the Jesuits. In addition, all they got is uncertain and unanswered truths. Moreover, the observer is confused whether the Native Americans are truly happy or displeased with the influences of the Jesuits.

You might be interested in
What made the Cherokee Trail of Tears so brutal?
aev [14]

Answer: The Cherokee Trail of Tears resulted from the enforcement of the Treaty of New Echota, an agreement signed under the provisions of the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which exchanged Indian land in the East for lands west of the Mississippi River, but which was never accepted by the elected tribal leadership or a majority.

Severe exposure, starvation and disease ravaged tribes during their forced migration to present-day Oklahoma. ... As many as 4,000 died of disease, starvation and exposure during their detention and forced migration through nine states that became known as the “Trail of Tears.”

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on what you have learned in this lesson, write two to three sentences describing one success and one failure of Clinton’s
cupoosta [38]

When the Genocide Convention was passed by the United Nations in 1948, the world said, “Never again.”

But the history of the twentieth century instead proved that “never again” became “again and again.”  The promise the United Nations made was broken, as again and again, genocides and other forms of mass murder killed 170 million people, more than all the international wars of the twentieth century combined.

Why?  Why are there still genocides?  Why are there genocidal massacres going on right now in southern Sudan by the Sudanese government against Dinka, Nuer, and Nuba; in eastern Burma by the Burmese government against the Karen; in the Democratic Republic of the Congo by both government and rebel forces against Tutsis, Banyamulenge, Hutus, Hema, and Lendu?  Why has ethnic and religious hatred again reached the boiling point in Israel and Palestine; Côte d’Ivoire, and Burundi?                                                     

There are two reasons why genocide is still committed in the world:

1.        The world has not developed the international institutions needed to predict and prevent it.

2.        The world’s leaders do not have the political will to stop it.

In order to prevent genocide, we must first understand it.  We must study and compare genocides and develop a working theory about the genocidal process.  There are many Centers for the Study of Genocide that are doing that vital work – in Australia, Brussels, Copenhagen, Jerusalem, Montreal, Memphis, Minneapolis, New Haven, Nottingham, and elsewhere.

But studying genocide is not enough.  Our next task should be to create the international institutions and political will to prevent it.  Four institutions are needed: centers for early warning, programs for conflict transformation, standing forces for rapid intervention, and international courts for effective punishment.

1.  The U.N. Security Council and key governments need strong, independent Early Warning systems to predict where and when ethnic conflict and genocide are going to occur, and to present policy options on prevention and intervention.  The Brahimi report made by the special commission on U.N. Peace-keeping makes just such a recommendation, and it should be implemented.  Selected country desk officers and top officials of the U.N. system now hold monthly “Framework for Coordination” to discuss current crises, but inadequate staffing prevents long-range strategic planning.  There is not a single person at the United Nations whose responsible for genocide early warning and prevention.  Who do you call? Ghostbusters.

:P

<span>
</span>
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was oklahoma called before it was called oklahoma
Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

Oklahoma was called Oklahoma Territory before it became just Oklahoma.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was Britain’s saving grace against German invasion
notsponge [240]

Answer:

Evacuation of Dunkirk

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What were the federalist papers and who were their targeted audience?
nirvana33 [79]
They were written in the midst of the debate over electing representatives to a ratifying convention in New York (state), and the immediate target audience was New York readers, particularly those who would be shaping the state’s approach to ratifying the Constitution. 
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How is mercantilism related to triangular trade and navigation acts
    8·1 answer
  • Describe three ways in which the ideas from the preamble of the Declaration of Independence are reflected in the U.S. constituti
    12·2 answers
  • Which place was the site of a victory for the continental army?
    15·2 answers
  • Need help ASAP!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • What can cause a migration counterstream?
    13·1 answer
  • What concession did Grant make to Lee in his terms of surrender?
    5·1 answer
  • 2 How did the changing climate encourage
    14·2 answers
  • What was the significance of the sinking of the Lusitania?
    13·1 answer
  • The quote below was written in the early 1900s:
    14·1 answer
  • In Colonial times, the French and Indians fought a war with Britain over American soil and ______ won.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!