1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irina [24]
3 years ago
7

Effective speakers use an extemporaneous delivery, which means the speakers have practiced their speech ahead of time and delive

red the actual speech A. from memory B. by reading from a prepared manuscript C. from a speaking outline D. all of the above
English
1 answer:
Dima020 [189]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B. by reading from a prepared manuscript.

Explanation:

In the manner of speech delivery, there are certain methods that a speaker may employ to successfully give his intended speech. Good speech delivery depends on many factors, which may or may not require the use of cards or pre-written cards. But amidst all these, an extemporaneous speaker may be termed as someone who uses prepared cards to efficiently deliver his speech, which is to say, may not be devoid of any glitches. But the use of the cards will enable the speaker to refer to it anytime he/ she gets stuck midway.

So, an effective speaker who uses an extemporaneous delivery is someone who reads from a prepared manuscript.

You might be interested in
What did you think of the end of the movie Romeo and Juliet ?
Neporo4naja [7]
Often times people say that William Shakespeare was and still is a legend.  They <span>are correct.  It is amazing how Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet written </span><span>centuries ago can be better than Franco Zefferelli's movie production of Romeo </span><span>and Juliet, which had much better technology to work with only decades ago. </span><span>Although the movie appeared better, it left out some major parts.  The play had </span><span>better mood and plot details which made it much more dramatic and by far a </span><span>better presentation. </span><span>One major difference between the play and the movie occurs in mood.  An example </span><span>of this is the marriage scene.  In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and </span><span>Juliet act very serious.  The reader can tell this by the way the two speak. </span><span>Romeo says that the Holy Words the Friar speaks can make something without an </span><span>equal (Act II, Scene 6, Line 4) which is a very intelligent thing to say. </span><span>Whereas, in the movie they kiss and giggle the entire time.  This leads the </span><span>viewer to believe that Franco Zefferelli wanted the two to look like fools, that </span><span>they could not do anything the way it is normally done because they are children </span><span>in search of quick love.  This is bad because it is not very realistic.  In </span><span>real-life, young adults would take the matter seriously because they know it is </span><span>a major step in life.  Because the play is not entirely trying to make the two </span><span>look bad, it is the better production. </span><span>Another major difference in the mood of the play and the movie is in the funeral </span><span>scene.  The funeral scene of the play is a very serious event.  Juliet's family </span><span>is very upset and think that they are the cause of her "death".  Also, the Friar </span><span>soothes the family of the loss of young Juliet's life (Act IV, Scene 5, Line 65). </span><span> However, in the movie version of the funeral scene, again everyone is sad but </span><span>this time the Friar lets out a giggle as he pretends to pray for Juliet.  This </span><span>is a major difference because if someone had seen the Friar giggle, it may have </span><span>changed the entire play.  They may have questioned him why he giggled but since </span><span>he would not have a reason he may just spill what he knows.  Since the movie was </span><span>once again unrealistic, the play is the better production in this scene as well. </span><span>Some other major differences between the play and the movie occurred in the plot </span><span>details.  One example of this is in the beginning of the story.  In the play, </span><span>Romeo is just getting over Rosaline "rejecting" him (Act I, Scene 1, Line 155). </span><span>This means that he could have just been very upset.  Resulting in him just </span><span>grabbing the first thing he could find which just happened to be Juliet.  If he </span><span>had never even met Rosaline he probably would have never met Juliet either. </span><span>Although in the movie version of this part, all that the viewer knows is that </span><span>Romeo is extremely upset from something that was never brought up.  If Franco </span><span>Zefferelli had added this to his production it would probably make more sense </span><span>that him just leaving it out and having the viewer guess what was the matter </span><span>with Romeo.  Due to this difference, the play once again is better because the </span><span>plot is more thought out then the movie where the viewer has to guess. </span><span>Another difference between the play and the movie in plot details is at the </span><span>ending of the entire story.  In the play, the families are finally at peace as </span><span>Romeo and Juliet's real funerals take place .  The Montague's even decide to </span><span>erect a gold statue of Juliet and the Capulet's shake hand's with them which are </span><span>very good signs that the long and bitter feud of the two families is over (Act V, </span><span>Scene 3, Line 295).  On the other hand,  the movie only shows that he two </span><span>families have come together.  But this is for a reason that virtually and two </span><span>groups would come together for-a funeral of one for one of their family members. </span><span>All that the families do to acknowledge each other is as they walk into the </span><span>church, they turn to face their equal in the opposite family.  This is probably </span><span>the biggest difference out of the productions because one of the goal's that </span><span>Romeo, Juliet and Friar Laurence had was that this marriage would end the </span><span>quarrels.  The play's version of this was better because nobody really wants to </span><span>see a sad story which Romeo and Juliet is until the end but the play makes it a </span><span>happy story (in a way) by one of Romeo and Juliet's primary goals being </span><span>completed, although they had to die for it. </span><span>Due to all of the examples listed here, the mood in the marriage scene, the mood </span><span>in the funeral scene, and the plot details in the beginning and the end of the </span><span>play, the play is without a doubt, the better production.  However, if Franco </span><span>Zefferelli had made his movie more as a work of art instead of a production, and </span><span>spent a little more time in doing so, he could have had himself one of the best </span>movies ever, which William Shakespeare did with his play Partner sites: Spanish Language Schools, Pit Bull, and Free Essays and Term Papers
7 0
3 years ago
PLZ ANSWER THIS #$%^&amp;*(*&amp;^%$ DOES THIS CATCH ATTENTION
dusya [7]
B
Pastries
Tastiest
I don’t know the 2nd one
Cross our hot
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find each missing angle measure<br> Please, justify your answer :)
Stolb23 [73]
Angle 4 is 88 degrees because a triangles angles should add up to 180 so just subtract the two angles inside from 180. for angles 3 you subtract the 88 from 180 because angles 3 and 4 should add up to 180 so angles 3 is 92 degrees
8 0
3 years ago
Journal 29--Respond using 4 to 5 complete sentences.
Juli2301 [7.4K]
I will do chores to help her long day. I will cook her dinner and take the dogs out for a walk. I will make it easier on her. I will lastly give her a lot of love.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Name the two boys that represent 'stolen childhood 'in the text of Lost spring? State the family background of each boy in the L
olasank [31]

Answer:

The first boy mentioned in the chapter is Saheb-E-Alam. He was a rag-picker who lived in Seemapuri. His family had migrated from Dhaka, Bangla Desh to India in 1971 with the hope of finding better life conditions. Every morning he roamed about streets collecting garbage. Many other boys also accompanied him. His family lived in miserable conditions. He could not afford to go to school. He did not have even a pair of slippers to wear. He wished to play lawn tennis which was beyond his reach. He also found a job at a tea-stall where he ran various errands for the tea-stall owner. Though he earned rupees eight hundred monthly along with meals every day, yet he was not happy working there.

His rag-picking bag was lighter than the

canister. He was his own master; but now

he had to work under someone

------

The second boy mentioned in the chapter is Mukesh. His family lived in Firozabad. Mukesh's family was trapped in this vicious circle. In fact every family involved in the bangle making is trapped in a vicious circle of the shahukars, the middlemen, the policemen, the keepers of law, the bureaucrats and the politicians. Their evil nexus did not let them be free. Approximately 20,000 children worked in the glass furnaces with high temperatures, in dingy cells without air and light, often losing the brightness of their eyes. Thus the bangle-makers of Firozabad lived in a state of perpetual poverty and exploitation.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is the group of words a simple sentence, a compound sentence, or a run-on sentence? Logan bought a guitar, took lessons twice a
    14·1 answer
  • I need help please! <br>​
    5·1 answer
  • What are rights a teacher has
    9·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from Roosevelt’s "Four Freedoms” speech.
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements about a sentence's subject is correct?
    5·1 answer
  • Why does katniss decide to stay away from peeta as much as possible?
    12·1 answer
  • The air was rent by piercing cries . What does it mean and what figurative language they using ?!
    11·1 answer
  • Read the excerpt from Story of My Life by Helen Keller.
    7·1 answer
  • How do you start a summary? For ""My Introduction to Gothic Literature"".
    11·1 answer
  • 1. While I ____________the performance, I met one of my old friends.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!