1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
V125BC [204]
4 years ago
11

Which of the following events occurred first?

History
2 answers:
Savatey [412]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Option A. Boston Massacre was the event which occurred first among the given options.

Explanation:

It was the most dangerous and brutal riot that included bloodshed. It started as a petty scuffle on the streets between American Colonists and British Soldiers in the Kings Street. The massacre happened in 1770

American colonists were frustrated of the British soldiers’ supremacy and four soldiers were killed in. This riot paved way for the American Revolution.

The American colonists started to rise against the British troops for American independence.

jasenka [17]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

George III was crowned.

Explanation:

George III was crowned in 1760.

The Boston Massacre occurred in 1770.

The intolerable acts were passed in 1774.

The declaration of independence was written in 1776.

You might be interested in
Who tryna be my babymomma?
BigorU [14]

Answer:

Not me

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
16. Which group experienced the most significant change as a result of WW2? Explain.
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

16. Women changed the most.

With all the men gone they worked in factories night and day and soon they fell in love with working and questioned why they couldnt work like men and get paid like them. So when the war was over the women took it up to the men and they change American womens history.

17. (This is a personal opinion)

Yes. If you know anything about the japanese during this time it is that they would never give in and never give up. They had extremely insane national pride, almost to that of Americans. Truman also knew this, and knew if he was to send out the U.S army into japan then we would surely lose a hefty number of american troops. So he decided to end it all with the atomic bombings.

18. Truman. (All the way)

See, people think that russia was the country who started the cold war but it was actually Truman. See Truman knew that russia was watching when he dropped those atomic bombs into Japan. Yes he did it to end the war in the Pacific Theatre, but he also did it to demonstrate what kind of power America had.

Explanation:

hope this helps you friend  ;)

6 0
4 years ago
Which of the following statements differentiates hunter-gatherer societies from more complex civilizations? A. Hunter-gatherers
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
I think it should be D
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can you guys please read this history essay and give it a grade based on grammar, vocabulary, accuracy and weather it responds w
Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

If I were a teacher I would probably give this a 80 or 82. All of the info is correct, but there are a lot of grammatical and vocab errors. I went ahead and revised it for you, the revised essay is below.

Explanation:

The founding fathers were justified in their actions to rebel against Britain, and declare their independence. Had they not built up the courage to stand up for themselves, America would not be the place it is today. The colonist's did what they needed to do in order to improve not only their own lives, but the lives of the generations that came after them. Think about how you would you react if our government decided to place unfair taxes and laws on us, going against the laws put in place to ensure fair and lawful taxation.

One specific act that was unfair to the colonists was the Quartering Act. The Quartering Act forced colonists to open their home to British soldiers at the drop of a pin. This means a soldier could knock on a colonist's door at any time and the colonist would have to give up a room for them, feed them, and allow them to stay however long they wanted; all without payment. This act was one of the ways Britain angered the colonists and pushed them towards rebellion.

Some people might argue that the colonists should have respected their government. Respect is an extremely important part of any relationship, but it has to go both ways; while the colonist's respected their government, there was no reciprocation of respect back to the colonists. Why would the colonists respect the British government if the British government won't respect them back? An example of how the British government disrespected the colonist is when they were protesting "No taxation without representation", the British government pretended to honor this but they eventually decided to place another taxing act on the colonists. As a result of the government's distrust in the colonies to govern themselves, the colonies did not trust the British government. The colonist's started their settlements with respect for their country, but due to mistakes from both parties, that respect was lost.

Many rights we have today are privileges that the colonists did not have; a few examples include; self government, trade with any country we desire, and voting for our laws. Living without those things made a huge impact on the quality of life for the colonists. Having no choice in how your life was going to be or how your government was run is more than just undesirable, it was something that made the colonists actively try to part from Britain.

The Stamp Act was one of the first British placed acts that infuriated the colonists. This act said "the colonists had to pay extra money to Britain every time they bought printed materials or legal documents". (Pg. 114 road to revolution text book). Anything that was made of paper had a tax; in order for their to be proof that you had paid the tax, you had to get a stamp and place it on the paper. "They felt that the British government had no right to make them pay the tax because there were no colonial representatives in the British Parliament" (Pg. 115 road to revolution text book). Several other acts followed this as the colonist kept protesting them out and the British kept coming up with new ways to tax them. Some of the acts that followed the stamp act are the Townsend act, the tea act and the intolerable acts.

In response to the Tea Act, and the unfair treatment from before, the colonists met in a group in Boston and dumped 342 chests of tea into the harbor. This event is called "The Boston Tea Party" and is considered one of the main events that caused the war. The colonists dressed as Indians, snuck onto the boat and dumped the tea, that was worth around a million dollars of today's money. The British reacted to this incident by creating the Intolerable Acts which led to even more rebellion from the colonists.

The colonists did what they needed to do in order for themselves and the generations after them to live a good life. The colonist's fought back against Britain by protesting, boycotting, throwing expensive tea into the ocean and fighting them in the Revolutionary War. If the colonists didn't fight for their freedom, we might still be a part of Great Britain. We would not be the country we are if the colonists had given in to the harsh laws enforced by Britain; therefore, the colonist's were justified in rebelling against and declaring their independence from Britain.

7 0
4 years ago
What do you believe was the most persuasive strategy & or argument by abolitionist? Explain your answer
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

The most persuasive and compelling argument made by abolitionists was that slavery is a sin, something immoral and contrary to the principles of Christianity.

The abolitionist movement began in the 1830s in the United States, and it started as a movement with a  religious profile, it became a political and ideological topic; it  was a sensitive, highly polemic issue that caused much acrimonious controversy, confrontation and the division of the country.

American abolitionists were in the beginning religious white men, though  white women, black men and women joined it later.

US abolitionists copied the tactics and strategy followed by abolitionists in Great Britain. In general, British anti-slavery supporters started to question intellectually the existence of slavery on moral and religious grounds in the late 18th century; it became an influential religious effort and finally, it became a political issue. Slavery in the whole empire was abolished in the 1830s.

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the level of autonomy that cuba obtained after the Spanish - American war
    12·1 answer
  • What was Brutus speech after Caesars death?
    11·2 answers
  • Provide one example of an event or development from the period starting in 1865 to 1900 in support of the point of view of curre
    11·2 answers
  • Who was the Communist leader of Vietnam's independence movement?
    12·1 answer
  • What can federal appeals courts do?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following are types of supporting materials? _testimonials _illustrations _explanations _all of the above _none of
    12·2 answers
  • What is the season in iran if it’s winter in china
    13·1 answer
  • Give someone five points to tell me good anime's on netfilx or hulu
    10·2 answers
  • Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa help
    10·2 answers
  • Why the reconstruction of the total past of mankind is unattainable?​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!