The answer is:
The following options benefit African consumers but not African farmers.
I. Subsidies to keep crop prices low
IV. Availability of imported grains
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>If you were to subsidize to keep prices low, consumers would benefit exclusively because the would pay a fixed rate for their farm products. On the other hand farmers would be affected because we don't know many factors that would influence this decission. Some of these factors may be.</em>
<em>- Will there be a price fixed for certain products</em>
<em>- Will the grains be cash crops</em>
<em>- Will farmers be allowed to rotate crops</em>
<em>Without knowing these factors one can only assume that when you susidize a crop the conditions imposed on the farmers may or may not be ideal.</em>
<em>When it comes to the availability of imported grains, some of these grains may be even cheaper than local grains. This may have a negative effect on local farmers who cannot lower their prices at a loss. Consumers would definitely benefit by paying lower prices from imported crops.</em>
The answer is Germany, Poland, United Kingdom, Japan, and Italy.
Answer:
Right choice:
They fought on both sides of the conflict, but most allied with the British.
Explanation:
The Native American tribes sided with both sides, mainly for benefits in trade and other advantages, though they did not share the imperial goals and feelings of their allies. In Canada, the Iroquois supported the British side, while the Huron Confederacy sided with the French, with whom they had had a good trade exchange since the 17th century. Another factors was the deep rivalry with the Iroquois.
In the American territory, most tribes chose the British side. It was because of the regular trade benefits. Native tribes had assimilated many European manufactured goods in their lifestyle, and some items had even a symbolic importance for chiefs and their policies of alliances. The British supply of such goods was more reliable than the French line of supply.
The conservatives were opposed to the detente
The detente was a period in the cold war that was characterized by a period of relaxed tensions between the two world powers, USA and Soviet union. The conservative dubbed the detente as akin to appeasement policy, and like appeasement and Germany expansionism, the soviet union abused it by invading Afghanistan in 1979.
<span />
Answer:
Sakoku (??, "closed country") was the isolationist foreign policy of the Japanese Tokugawa shogunate (aka Bakufu) under which, for a period of over 220 years, relations and trade between Japan and other countries were severely limited, nearly all foreign nationals were barred from entering Japan and common Japanese. From 1633 until 1853, the military governments of Japan enforced a policy of sakoku or 'closed country' which prevented foreigners from entering Japan on penalty of death, and prohibited Japanese citizens from leaving.
