If the story would have been from Laurie's perspective, A. The audience would have been afraid of Laurie's mother because Laurie is so afraid of her, and C. The audience might have known that Laurie was misbehaving at school and making up the "Charles" character to mislead his mother.
It is clear that Laurie is afraid of his mother, he wouldn't have invented Charles to cover up for his misbehaving otherwise. This fear would have appear in the story, as well as the truth of his behaviour.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A satire is a statement meant to make fun or mock a particular idea. Hyperbole is intention exaggeration. So, satirical hyperbole is the combination of both. In option B, the writer is trying to disagree and make fun of the curfew idea comparing it to a rainy day, which is obviously not possible.
Uhm, I don’t really understand the question, but I’ll just say
Depression really is hard to fight.. It’s hard to move on..
An example of interactive speeches is speaker defines a word when she sees the audience is confused.
<h3>What are interactive speeches?</h3>
Interactive speeches are speeches that are delivered which require the maximum interaction between the speaker and the audience.
Both parties are involved in the speeches.
Therefore, An example of interactive speeches is speaker defines a word when she sees the audience is confused.
Learn more about interactive speeches below.
brainly.com/question/27617352
#SPJ1
The answer is: The film has Rainsford explain about the trap in his dialogue with his female companion.
This excerpt shows how Rainsford made a “Malay mancatcher” that is a tramp and get to wound the general with it, for this reason the general congratulates Rainsford, however, this part in the film adaptation this part of the story is explain in a dialog by Rainsford to her female companion.
