Question

What is the main idea in this ruling? How could it impact United States v. Fields? Write a two- to three-sentence response that answers both questions.

Answer 1

Sample response: In this case, the Court ruled that states must prove that a person had malice when he or she created a false statement. Malice is an intentional decision to cause harm. This case relates to my case because it explains that speech can be restricted for content reasons if malice can be proven.

Answer 2

The United States v. Fields could impact the public officials cannot victim libel unless, the false statement in the United States I think is a big impact and a crime. Field never served in the military so they consider that was convicted under stolen value.