Answer and explanation:
Character chosen for the following analysis: Mr. Darcy.
Mr. Darcy is one of the main characters of the romantic novel written by Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice. He's a very rich, very serious young man that does not show any kind of interest in meeting young ladies (unlike he's closest friend) since he has an arranged marriage from a really young age.
This goes around this way until he meets Elizabeth Bennet, a young lady that will change all of his world all of a sudden, but, of course, this plot twist will show slowly along the whole novel.
Their relationships seems rough at first and they act more like two people that can't stan each other, but progressively they find out that they have a similar mind on various topics of interest. So from there on, their relationship starts getting better, more friendly, until it develops into something more.
Answer: Explanation:
1. discrimination. Example: <em>The law has done little to prevent racial discrimination and inequality.</em>
2. communication. Example: <em>She has good communication with her mother.</em>
3. diplomatic. Example: <em>Lawyers should be diplomatic i dealing with a judge. He gave a diplomatic answer.</em>
4. mediation. Example: <em> In a mediation, both sides must agree on who oversees the process.</em>
5. career cluster. Example: Interior designer is in the career cluster of carpenter, architech and civil engineer.
Its capitalized because it is stating a persons name someones name
Answer:
Machiavelli's human view mostly states that human nature is selfish, aggressive, greedy and power-hungry, but in need of security and safety.
Thus, he considers man in a similar way to that of Thomas Hobbes: humans have a predominantly negative conception, their individual characteristics are prone to evil, and society is a containment in which humans limit those characteristics. But he differs from Hobbes in that he believes that humans have advanced intelligence, and that he uses his selfishness and lack of empathy to achieve the goals he sets for himself, justifying the means in the end he sets for himself.
