Answer:
A, B, E
Explanation:
A: Euthanasia must be legal for it to be morally <em>and</em> legally permissible. If it is illegal, it's basically considered murder in the area.
B: Euthanasia means to relieve someone of their pain by ending their life. This is a very grave decision that has irreversible consequences. If there are other ways to relieve the patient's suffering that are much less harmful, they should come before ending the patient's life.
C: Ending a life for the benefit of others is immoral because it is an irreversible consequence. You are taking the life of another human for other people to temporarily feel better. That is not okay and should never be considered as a justifiable factor.
D: You would be taking the life of someone else to make yourself an exemplar for others. That's basically exploiting their death for your benefit. That is immoral because you are not considering the best interest and well-being of the patient.
E: The doctor and patient must have a previous agreement to provide euthanasia because if there was no such agreement, it would be against or without the patient's consent. This would be immoral because you are not taking into consideration the decisions and rights of the patient.
-
These are my opinions, but it's up to you to decide the best options based on your morals and social customs. Good luck!
A state of hyperactivity and unreasonable elation that may include impulsive behavior is called <u>Mania.</u>
<u></u>
<u></u>
- Mania is a condition in which you have a period of abnormally elevated, extreme changes in your mood or emotions, energy level or activity level. This highly energized level of physical and mental activity and behavior must be a change from your usual self and be noticeable by others
- . Mania can be a part of several mental health conditions including:
- Bipolar I disorder (most common condition for mania to occur).
- Seasonal affective disorder.
- Postpartum psychosis.
- Schizoaffective disorder.
- Cyclothymia.
to know more about state of hyperactivity click here
brainly.com/question/3576222
#SPJ4
The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution contain due process clauses.
Answer:
Fur
Explanation:
New Netherland was a Dutch colony conquered by the Dutch Company of the West Indies (WIC) in 1621. This colony was a great commercial success, capable of capitalizing efficiently and competitively on the purchase and sale of fur, a major center of this product. This success took time to occur, due to several factors, but it became a strong trigger for the economic prospects that the Netherlands sought to exploit in the territory. The outlook was so high that fur exploration can be seen even on the New Netherland label.
Answer:
Religious Organizations.
Explanation:
A religious reason for existing is one of the seven absolved purposes determined in Sections of the Internal Revenue Code. Be that as it may, not at all like with the expressions "magnanimous," "instructive," and "logical," the expression "religious" isn't characterized in the Treasury Regulations, in expansive part because of established issues. IRS direction clarifies under the First Amendment, the Service can't consider the substance or wellsprings of a teaching asserted to comprise a specific religion, and can't assess the substance of a tenet an association claims is religious. This does not make a difference to rituals or practices that abuse government, state or nearby law.
