1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Viktor [21]
3 years ago
10

Hamlet is a study of what happens to a world when it is completely dominated by men, and it is essentially a cautionary, feminis

t examination of a world that is incapable of understanding women and denies them any kind of power.
History
2 answers:
SVEN [57.7K]3 years ago
8 0

rough draft- not been fixed yet-- hope it helps. from DJG

Hamlet could be interpreted  of what happens to a world when it is completely dominated by men.   While the women weren’t “completely” dominated by men, in my opinion, they certainly had challenging relationships with Hamlet, Claudius, Laertes and Polonius.  

Hamlet was written by William Shakespeare in approximately 1601, during the Renaissance period.   During that time young men attended school and learned about math and philosophy. Young women went to school to learn needlework and dancing.   Although dancing was a very important class, it is an example of how men viewed women during that time.  Generally a young girl had two options, to agree to an arranged marriage or join a convent to become a nun.  

There are two main female characters in Hamlet.   Gertrude is the Queen and Hamlet's mom.  Ophelia is a girl who has a crush on Hamlet.  

Both women were controlled by the men in the story, but Ophelia is definitely the weaker of the two.

Examples of male domination, or control is that Queen Gertrude accepted the fact that her husband,  King Hamlet was murdered by her own brother-in-law, Claudius.  Then she even gave in and married him.    Hamlet, the son , ends up with a severe dislike of his mother , after she marries Claudius.   Even though Hamlet’s feelings may be justified,  generally sons don’t have repulsions or sharp criticisms for their mothers.  Hamlet confronts Gertrude "As kill a king, and marry his brother?" (Shakespeare  Act 3 scene 4).  

Ophelia was controlled by Laertes, her brother concerning her relationship with Hamlet.   He told her  to not even expect to marry Hamlet because a prince can never marry for love.  Princes of the day  (even  to some extent now) were expected to marry other nobility to carry on the family line.   Even Ophelia’s father, Polonius was against Ophelia and Hamlet’s relationship because poor Hamlet was going mad, possibly over Ophelia’s flirtations.   However, a counter argument to that is perhaps Hamlet was actually interested in Ophelia but had the inner conflict of knowing that he could not marry outside the nobility.  

Some would argue that Gertrude possibly had more control over the situation than the men had over her.     It’s possible that she ended up controlling Claudious.  After her husband’s death, she may have been forced out of the castle and the life that she was accustomed to.  But instead, she made sure that she kept the title of Queen by marrying her own brother –in-law.  So she took control of her destiny by staying with her husband’s killer.   Her son Hamlet didn’t like it, but by doing so, that’s even more proof that she wasn’t completely controlled by men.  Hamlet was mean to Ophelia.   He had given her some gifts and when she tried to return them, he denied even giving them to her.     And then a famous line from the play, sums up easily how men felt about women’s choices of the day. Hamlet said to Ophelia "Get thee to a nunnery: Why wouldst thou be a breeder of sinners?" (Shakespeare Act 3 scene 1).

Following the form of a traditional tragedy, it ends in Tragedy. Both women die, and both because they were in some way dominated over men.     Ophelia felt there was no other way to be happy, so she chose death and drowned herself.  Gertrude was caught up in the violent last act and between poisoning and stabbing,  even though she was not the intended target, she also tragically died.  

 



UkoKoshka [18]3 years ago
5 0
Is this a question or a statement i cant understand???
You might be interested in
An example of natural selection is the tail of a male peacock. The females of the species choose mates based on the colors of th
maxonik [38]
Given the situation above regarding natural selection on mating peacocks, if ever females begin to change different criteria than feather color when they choose mates, what would eventually happen to the tails of the peacocks over time is that there would be a decrease in variation in <span>tail feather color because the only reason for variation was selection pressure. The answer is the last option.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
List down 5 pros and 5 cons of having laws.<br><br><br><br> C.L.E
klemol [59]

Answer:

5,5

Explanation:

5 pros:

1)Uniformity and Certainty:

Law provides Uniformity and certainty to the administration of justice. The same law has to be applied in all cases. There can be no distinction between one case and another case if the facts are the same.

2)Protection against arbitrary, biased and dishonest decisions:

If the administration of Justice is left completely to the individual discretion of a judge, improper motives and dishonest opinions could affect the distribution of justice. Law as Fixed Principles of the law of justice avoids the danger of arbitrary, biased and dishonest decisions.

3)Freedom from errors of individual judgement:

The fixed principles of law protect the administration of justice from the errors of individual judgement. Commenting on this aspect of law, the Greek Philosopher Aristotle observed that "to seek to be wiser than the law is the very thing which is by good laws forbidden." This, in other words, means that "law is not always necessarily wise but on the whole and in the long run it is wiser than those who administer it".

4)Reliability :

There is another advantage of law is its reliability. It is more reliable than the individual judgements of the Courts. The human mind is fallible and judges are no exception. The wisdom of the legislature which represents the wisdom of the people is safer and more reliable means of protection than the momentary fancy of the individual judge.

5)I can't think of any more, sorry

5 cons:

1)The rigidity of law:

An Ideal legal system keeps on changing according to the changing needs of the people. But because of the rigidity of law, it is unable to keep pace with the fast-changing society. There is always a gap between the advancement of society and the legal system prevailing in it. The lack of flexibility in law results in hardship and injustice to the people.

2)Conservative Nature:

Another disadvantage of law is that its Conservative Nature. Law is conservative in its approach. The Bar and Bench are generally conservative in their approach to the dispensation of justice. The result is is that very often the law is static. This is not conducive to a progressive society.

3)Formalism:

The Law suffers from excessive formalism greater emphasis laid on the form of law rather than its substance. Undue formalism causes unnecessary delay in dispensation of justice.

4)Complexity :

Another disadvantage of law is its Complexity. It is true that every law effort is made to make law as simple as possible but it is not possible to make every law simple. That is due to the Complex nature of modern society.Commenting on the advantages and disadvantages of law Salmond observed that if the benefits of the law are great, the evils too are not small. Be that it may, it cannot be denied law serves as an effective instrument of social change. Law must change to the changing condition.

5)I can't think of any more, sorry

3 0
2 years ago
What was the NAACP's goal in filing the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education lawsuit?
algol13

Answer:

to end segregation in public schools

Explanation:

end segregation in public schools

6 0
3 years ago
describe the political, economic, social, and religious characteristics of english colonies in the Chesapeake region, new Englan
Yuliya22 [10]

a chart to compare the Chesapeake and New England colonies from 1607 to ... Economic System in Chesapeake ... plantation aristocracy held disproportionate social and political power to its ... Most importantly religious, but some commercial. ... Features. Quizlet Live · Quizlet Learn · Diagrams · Flashcards · Mobile. Help.

6 0
3 years ago
What caused broadcasters to refrain from airing controversial issues because they had to provide competing points of view when o
Sindrei [870]
FCC Fairness Doctrine--this doctrine created in 1949 required news programs present a balanced report on issues. 

This doctrine ensured that the news were presented fairly with both sides. This doctrine of reporting was in place until 1987 which then saw the birth of one-sided news broadcasting. 
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What statements best reflects the economic policy of harding and coolidge
    10·1 answer
  • Need help to find this answer sum one help me
    11·1 answer
  • How can you get does golden crowns
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes a trend in American consumption in the 1950s?
    12·1 answer
  • BRAINLIEST TO FIRST CORRECT ANSWER
    13·2 answers
  • Based on the map, which two of the following statements are most likely true? aztec empire
    11·1 answer
  • Some energy resources can be used over again without being depleted, or used up. These are called renewable energy resources. Wh
    9·1 answer
  • Question 1(Multiple Choice Worth 3 points)
    7·1 answer
  • The Social Security Act created
    10·1 answer
  • What was the name of the writing system created by the Heian aristocracy?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!