<span>B)Immigration act 1924
hope this helps
#history</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?
No, really not.
The reason why because his account had created many controversies.
Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.
So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.
What country are you asking for?
C. Islam. Explanation: Muhammad (founder of Islam) was born and Mecca. He later fled to Medina with Abu Bakr later in his life (due to the hate that he was getting for his religion in Mecca. ) also the kaaba (a shrine for muslims) is locates in Mecca. ALSO, Mecca is Islam’s holy city which only Muslims are allowed to enter. ALSO, Muslims have to follow the five pillars of Islam which includes hajj ( or pilgrimage) meaning that at least once in their life a Muslim will have to travel to Mecca
The Carbonari (charcoal burners) were groups of secret revolutionary societies founded in early 19th-century Italy. The Italian Carbonari may have further influenced other revolutionary groups in Spain, France, Portugal and possibly Russia
