Mark's action on the given scenario above is that he is showing courtesy. Courtesy is a way of showing politeness towards other people. This is shown where Mark ended the call because Kelly already arrives. He prioritizes Kelly first because he does not want to make her wait and she's already there to see him.
Answer:
The answer is: 4) More frequently than not, the three objectives are compatible.
Explanation:
Toyota is famous for its Just in Time (JIT) management. They are the absolute kings of efficient supply chain management and they were able to do it by making the three objectives compatible. That doesn't mean that they all have to be dealt with at the same time and with the same intensity.
Toyota's first goal was to reduce costs and in order to reduce costs they had to increase their inventory turnover. Then they discovered that in order to keep increasing inventory turnover, they had to compress their cycle time. When they were able to compress their cycle time, their turnover increased even more and their costs were lowered. The system produces continuous feedback and their efficiency keeps increasing.
I once visited one of their factories that produces almost 500 pickup trucks per day and every single work station had available inventory for only 4 trucks; only 4 engines, 16 doors, etc. It is amazing how they do it considering that every 3 minutes one truck is fully produced.
The three objectives are not only compatible, but they are absolutely necessary for the SCM to be effective.
A solution that will help in the agency problem in terms of
publiclyminus – held corporations is by through having bonuses in the company
or organization that will be based on primarily the short term results that
they have acquired in the company.
Answer:
He may still be covered in some cases.
He faces more risk than insured people do.
He may have to take precautions but many factors are beyond his control.
Not being able to afford insurance was a factor in him not being covered.
Explanation:
I got it correct
Answer:
$5,000
Explanation:
The computation of total amount of excess fair over book value amortization expense adjustments to be recognized by red is shown below:-
Excess of fair value over book value = Land fair value - Land book value
= $52,000 -$42,000
= -$10,000
Here land is not amortized
Excess of fair value over book value = Building fair value - Building book value
= $390,000 - $200,000
= $190,000
Excess fair value over book value amortization expense adjustments to be recognized by red = Excess of fair value over book value of building ÷ Number of Years
= $190,000 ÷ 10
= $19,000
Excess of fair value over book value = Equipment fair value - Equipment book value
= $280,000 - $350,000
= ($70,000)
Excess fair value over book value amortization expense adjustments to be recognized by red for equipment = Excess of fair value over book value of equipment ÷ Number of Years
= ($70,000) ÷ 5
= ($14,000)
Total amount of excess fair over book value amortization expense adjustments to be recognized by red
= $19,000 - $14,000
= $5,000
