Answer:
America “lost” South Vietnam because it was an artificial construct created in the wake of the French loss of Indochina. Because there never was an “organic” nation of South Vietnam, when the U.S. discontinued to invest military assets into that construct, it eventually ceased to exist.
Explanation:
The United States continued to prop up South Vietnamese government with military forces, it is conceivable that the entity could have continued into the 1980s, thus bringing it closer to when the Soviet Union collapsed and most communist nations in the world (China being a notable exception) ceased to exist. However, the American public had grown tired of the loss of American lives and of the war itself, meaning that there’s was no way that U.S. military involvement in the region could continue.
Also, had the United States launched a full-scale military invasion of North Vietnam instead of confining the war to the southern half of the country, the war would have largely ended in the mid- to late 1960s. There would have been some guerrilla actions for years and perhaps some incursions from Laos or Cambodia, but there would have been a unified Vietnam that was noncommunist.
Answer:
I would say more to the time period of slavery
Explanation:
In that time during slavery and Civil rights movement they were more involved in the history when you look at it they published many famous books as well.
<h3>2
. the supreme law of the United States</h3>
In our country, anything decrees written within our United States documents such as the Constitution stand supreme over state laws or other state level decrees. Therefore federal law is the supreme law of the land.
<h3>
3. implied</h3>
N/A
<h3>
4. popular sovereignty </h3>
According to the philosophy of "popular sovereignty", the term itself states that it's the consent of the people to control their government [as the bottom line]. With this in mind, Sandra is exercises her popular sovereignty by choosing who she wants her officials to be, hence the ownership in her own decision.
<h3>
5. State Government</h3>
Certain individuals favor giving the national government more power but foresee potential power-hungry acts to come out of this. Most people to this day still agree that state governments should take more of a role in the central government.
<h3>
6. Implied</h3>
Our government needed flexibility in creating their own powers to execute organized and substantial actions for our country- implied powers DO NOT appear on the constitution, so notice in the name itself elastic, meaning stretch, or even "necessary and proper" which could mean what is NEEDED for something to happen.
<h3>
7. The Constitution is the document which outlines the plan of government of the United States including three branches of government and a system of federalism.
</h3>
The other options are far-fetched and invalid. The constitution outlines our government with how it should operate.
<h3>
8. Checks and Balances</h3>
In the situation where one branch, in this case executive (since its the president), makes a veto that is unfair or merely bias, the other branches can balance this out and overrule it for the better of its people. No branch shall be more powerful than another!
C: <span>All serfs were created equal and had no freedom.</span>
