By inference, the way in which Zaroff is portrayed as Rainsford’s foil is that: "Zaroff is a person without a conscience, but Rainsford has one." (Option B)
<h3>What is the explanation for the above inference?</h3>
As evidenced by the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering others, which he regards as a form of hunting.
He has no regard for human life and is unconcerned whether they live or die, which distinguishes his character from Rainsford's.
Learn more about inference at;
brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answers are A and B.
A) It states how Van Lew acted as an important leader and manager at a time when women were generally discouraged from taking on those roles.
B) It shows that Van Lew was dedicated to a cause outside of her family and worked hard for her beliefs.
Explanation:
In the excerpt, the author develops two main ideas.
First, the author explains that Elizabeth Van Lew was a spymaster who was running a great network agents, couries and safe houses during the world war, which was not a common role for women in 19th century. She indeed played as an important leader and role model for women.
Secondly, the author suggests that Elizabeth Van Lew dedicated her life to being the leader because she believed in this cause. She even used her house for the duty and went past the family limitations which restricted the most women in that age.
The symbolism of the new cloak in this excerpt is - the new cloak represents Odysseus's transformation from a weary traveler to the returning hero.
He spent many years on the sea, far from his family and loved ones, and he became old and tired. This new cloak is his transformation - he is a hero now, and he has come back to Ithaca to rule again.
Answer: A single word, a word with hyphen, or as two words. Hope this helps!
Explanation:
The correct answer is <span>a free-form outline is not organized from top to bottom
The remaining possible answer are incorrect.</span>
